[Reproduction of Michael Speaks: The 7 Emotions, with some participant interaction omitted]
We understand the topic of focus is that of the Emotions.
First, as you explore the concept of Emotions, we will point out that "feelings" and Emotions are not, technically, the same things. They are so interconnected that they are often considered the same thing, but for the sake of the topic today, it will be helpful to understand that the "feeling" aspect is a bodily reaction/response to the energy that is Emotion.
Emotions are more like a surge of energy, a kind of electricity, if you will, and your processing of that is what you call "feelings."
All Emotions originate from the Emotional Center.
These are then distributed, or processed, through the Parts of that Center, which funnels the energy into the other Centers relative to the Part.
So, for example, if an Emotion is a Moving Part Emotion, it still originates from the Emotional Center, is processed by the Moving Part, and directed toward the Moving Center then.
We will return to this circuitry a bit later.
All Emotions Are Personal -- Only About Oneself
Because all Emotions are of the Emotional Center, this means they are always related to ORDINAL INSPIRATION. This means that all Emotions are personal, and they are either a result of PROJECTION or REFLECTION.
Emotions are personal (ordinal) in that they only ever tell you about YOU.
Emotions never tell you anything about anyone other than yourself. Ever.
It is an information circuitry that is entirely unique to you, about you, and is all about your collection of experiences, organized in layers of time, and that are then used to measure against your current experiences. All of this is a form of navigation.
This is all true whether one is Emotionally-Centered, or not.
When one is Emotionally-Centered, it simply means this form of navigation is relied upon far more than the other two forms (Intellectual and Moving).
All fragments will have all three forms inherent to the incarnation, of course
No matter how provoked, your Emotions are informing you about you; not the other person or even the event.
When we say that they are "informing you about you, we mean that they are sifting through your collection of experiences over time and comparing the current experience to a past one for reference. If you have a painful experience in your records, a current experience might trigger that painful association and the current experience will be regarded as painful, even if it may not be painful.
Because Emotions are Inspirational, they are LOADED with POTENTIAL. They are not reality. They only speak to the potential of a reality. So, for instance, this reference to a painful experience from the past is only meant to suggest that the current experience MIGHT BE painful, too. It is not meant to tell you that your current experience IS painful.
And therein lies the difference between PROJECTION and REFLECTION.
Projection is a reactionary processing of Emotions that presume that what is "felt" is the conclusive truth. If you feel it, it must be true. That is that. This is Projection.
This is why we continue to remind our students that Emotions are not the truth.
In a sense, Emotions are ALWAYS about the PAST.
So the truth that you "feel" is about the past, not the present or the future.
This is not a bad thing or a good thing, it is simply how Emotion functions.
Even the best of how you feel is a product of the past.
For example: you may find that the watching of the setting Sun is one that brings joy. But this is because it is not your first sunset. First sunsets for many fragments (in those early lifetimes) was terrifying. The world was plunged into darkness and new creatures emerged in that darkness, and nothing was ever the same again. Until the morning, of course. But then it would happen again. This was terrifying.
Eventually, enough experience with sunsets brings Trust, and it is known that the Sun has not died, and it will rise again in the morning.
To be clear, this Trust still cannot speak to the TRUTH. It can only speak to experience. MORE THAN LIKELY the sun will rise, and MORE THAN LIKELY the sun has not died, but there may very well come a night that never ends.
As you can see, Trust then becomes an important Emotion for navigating because one cannot constantly fight and fear a sunset.
If there comes a day when the sun does not rise, you will deal with that. Until then, you live as if the sun will rise again, because you Trust that it will, and you Trust that it will because you have enough experience to do so.
This is no different in processing when it comes to relationships.
It is fair to be wary of new relationships if one has experienced pain in one or more. Your Emotions are telling you to be careful, and that another round of relating COULD result in another round of pain. But, remember, Emotions are not the truth. They are only referencing your experience, and your experience, while your own, is not a constant. You lived in terror for years, afraid that the sun may not rise again. That fear and pain and terror was real. It is fair to be wary as the night falls again.
But your fear, pain, and terror are not a constant, because you continue to gather experiences.
And as your days are found to be filled over and over again, despite the terrors that the night will come, you begin to note this and grow from it, and face each day and night with Trust.
The same is true of your relationships.
The fear and pain and terror of your losses when a relationship ends or departs from expectations can make the next relationship seem a breeding ground for more terror, fear, and pain. But a new relationship is like a new day. IT WILL END. AND YOU WILL NOT.
And just like the passing of days, you will find that relationships, like your days and nights, are uniquely filled with what you put into them, and are not defined by their beginning and "end."
This is REFLECTION, then.
PROJECTION is when you impose your past on an experience, relationship, or event. REFLECTION is when you learn from your past, but allow the greatest potential of the present or future.
What we have shared, so far, is how Emotions function, how they are processed, what they are for, and what they mean.
Though there many words to describe Emotions and how one feels, all Emotions can be traced back to one of seven basic Emotions, or as a combination of two or more of these basic Emotions.
Those SEVEN BASIC EMOTIONS are:
TRUST, DISGUST, ANTICIPATION, SADNESS, JOY, ANGER, SURPRISE.
Trust is of the Instinctive Part.
Anticipation is of the Higher Emotional Part.
Joy is of the Higher Intellectual Part.
Surprise is of the Higher Moving Part.
Disgust is of the Emotional Part.
Sadness is of the Intellectual Part.
Anger is of the Moving Part.
FEAR is not an Emotion, technically, anymore than Truth is or Love or Energy, in any technical sense.
Many "emotions" that are referenced by other terms are combinations of the above, either in negative or in positive pole combinations.
None of these Emotions are bad or good, but all can be experienced in beneficial or harmful ways.
Before we break down these Emotions into polarities, we will open the floor to any questions relative to what we have shared so far.
[DianeHB] What IS Fear, if not an emotion?
Fear is a "feeling," a secondary response or reaction to the processes of Emotions of Anger and Surprise.
Fear, then, could be said to be the body's reaction of protection against negative experiences relative to Anger and Surprise.
Keep in mind that the entire concept of Fear is one that is far more insidious and pervasive than this simplified version we speak of. We are speaking of Fear in terms of Emotions here, but we may speak of fear in larger terms in other discussions.
But for the point of discussion regarding Emotion, Fear is often that bodily reaction to protections against all that is related to negative experiences of Anger and Surprise.
In broader terms, it could be said that Fear is also the bodily response to all of these Emotions in their negative poles.
[Juni] I am wondering about the difference between feelings/emotions and intuition. If feelings/emotions only ever tell you about oneself, how do you distinguish that from a "feeling" about another?
Intuition is different from Emotions. Again, these are often presumed to be the same things, which is why many who use "intuition" are merely guided by a maze of emotions, and not insights.
This is not a bad thing in the end, because when "intuition" is thought to be a process of navigating Emotionally, it can still be helpful, since Emotions always lead one back to the self. This can be just as important as guiding one outwardly.
However, to more directly respond to your question, one's "feelings" about another person can still be useful, even if those feelings or Emotions are informing one about the self. It simply means that one has owned the feeling as one's own, and not as having originated from another person.
If a person "makes you feel good," it is informing you as to how you feel about that person, but it is not necessarily how anyone else might feel about that person. And it only tells you how you feel about that person RIGHT NOW, not about how you will feel about that person in the future. All of this speaks to your past as a reference, too.
If you meet someone and presume that your good feelings are the truth about that person, you have immediately cut yourself out of the picture as a source of those good feelings. This is often the case when "falling in love."
Presuming that these Emotions and feelings are sourced by someone else means that there will likely come a day that the other is then blamed for less pleasant feelings.
This becomes problematic for relating to someone because then the emphasis shifts away from how you contribute to your range of emotions and feelings, and the emphasis shifts toward how to get the other person to make you feel the way you had expected to feel.
So there is no real differentiation here. Your feelings about a person are your own, and are not the truth about another person.
There is a big difference between "I feel good" and "You make me feel good."
Intuition, however, is another topic, and it is a synthesis of input from all of your senses so that comprehension can be gained.
[ViP1] Hi Michael. I've read in psychology articles that insufficient contact or interaction (as an infant) with one's mother (or perhaps both parents) in the form of touch, and responses to facial and other cues, can inhibit peoples' abilities to recognize and describe their emotions (or perhaps, feelings?) And hence, leading to difficulties in dealing with them (emotions - or perhaps feelings, I'm not sure which based on your earlier distinction between them. Probably feelings.) Would you say that there is validity to this, and if so, if someone has had this experience in early life, how the processing circuitry is affected (and if possible, tips on how to rectify it, ie, recognize and process emotions effectively?)
Any issues with care taking during the first 7 years can affect the Instinctive Part and, therefore, affect one's TRUST. Trust is reset in every lifetime, but how one is handled, treated, nurtured, born, etc. can skew that function so that it has some range of challenges.
All Emotions are reset in every lifetime.
But as one progresses through the Internal Monads, these Emotions are explored in a way that locks them into Projection or frees them into Reflection.
These are not tied to the Internal Monads in a way that leaves an Internal Monad unfinished if the Emotion is not freed, but there do tend to be periods of the life where the various Emotions are emphasized in exploration.
For example, Trust is explored and emphasized between the 1st and the 2nd Internal Monad.
The 1st and 2nd Internal Monads can be successfully closed, even if Trust is not freed, but there is a rather high correlation to the level of trust vs distrust that one has in relation to whether one has completed those Internal Monads. In other words, there does TEND to be a much higher level of distrust among those who have not successfully closed their 2nd Internal Monad.
DISGUST is explored and emphasized from the 2nd Internal Monad all the way through the 3rd Internal Monad.
This is why you will find your toddlers to teens emphasizing this in ways that can be repellent and difficult.
ANTICIPATION is explored during these, as well.
Whereas SADNESS and JOY are explored and emphasized during the 4th Internal Monad.
While ANGER and SURPRISE are explored and emphasized during the 5th Internal Monad.
This is not to say that these Emotions do not exist as emphasis at any other time. We did not say that, nor did we imply that. But it is to say that those stages tend to be when those particular Emotions come to be truly resolved and freed, or locked into a more restricted state.
Speak to a fragment who is successfully navigating the 5th Internal Monad and you will speak to someone who has all but lost the charge of Anger as a form of helplessness, and has freed it to become a form of motivation.
Emotions as Polarities
This may be a good segue into these Emotions as polarities.
Think of the poles below as describing the Emotion as restricted or freed, and therefore more subject to Projection vs Reflection.
TRUST as restricted might be FOOLISH/DISTRUST, and freed as CONFIDENCE/AWARENESS
DISGUST as restricted might be CAUSTIC/LOATHSOME and freed as HUMOROUS/PREFERENCE
Keep in mind that our polarities here are not necessarily emotions. These are merely adjectives to help understand the spectrum of that particular Emotion.
SADNESS is restricted as PATHETIC/SELF-PITY and freed as GRIEF/HONESTY.
ANGER is restricted as DEPRESSION/BLAME, and freed as MOTIVATION/PURPOSE.
ANTICIPATION is restricted as AGITATION/DISDAIN, and freed as ENTHUSIASM/CONSIDERATION.
[ViP1] Michael, just to confirm, you are giving negative poles first, then positive, as usual (eg, ENTHUSIASM: -ve, /CONSIDERATION: +ve?)
What we are sharing with the two terms for each pole is the branching that the restriction or freeing can show up as. For instance, some restrictive Trust shows up much more like Foolishness or blind faith than as Distrust.
But Foolishness and Distrust are fair ranges to include how the Freed end would show up.
JOY is restricted as OBNOXIOUS/SELF-INDULGENT, and freed as INCLUSIVE/INVITING
SURPRISE is restricted as RESISTANCE/DISREGARD, and freed as ADAPTIVE/PLAYFUL.
To bring further correlation, it could be said that these Emotions are more inherently explored and emphasized in various Essence Roles, as well, though this is certainly in no strict sense of delineation.
Scholars - Trust; Servers - Disgust; Artisans - Sadness; Warriors - Anger; Priests - Anticipation; Sages - Joy; Kings - Surprise.
These inherent Emotions might be said to be a long-term spectrum for each Role to truly comprehend from its worst to its best.
Furthermore, one COULD look at one's overleaves and "translate" his or her profile to show how the Personality might be emphasizing certain Emotions as exploration and emphasis.
For example, if one has a greater emphasis down the Moving Axis, one might be exploring the wide range of Anger and how this is both debilitating and motivating.
Edited by Janet