Jump to content
  • Discrimination: Negative and Positive Poles

    KurtisM

    [Extracted from MMW: Understanding your Overleaves]

     

    Johanne: I am working as a team with 2 other people. We are not fully functional because one seems to me to be in the negative poles of her discrimination goal and realistic attitude. The two others: we are both in acceptance goal; for attitude: one is pragmatic and one is spiritualist. How such 3 set of overleaves could work better together or how to help each other to get out of the negative poles? The 3 of us are in observation mode. We all have arrogance in one of our CF.

     

    To be brief, you can focus just on the discrimination: how to help go from the negative to the positive

     

    MEntity:
    REJECTION comes when one does not want to make a choice. One tends not to want to make a choice when the choices are not appealing, or when the choices are unclear, or one does not want the responsibility of choice. It is "easier" to simply reject than it is to do the work of Refinement. REFINEMENT is a state of responsibility for choice, the work of understanding and clarifying and questioning.

     

    Sometimes the process of Refinement for Discrimination can look like the Negative Pole to others who do not use the same process for making choices.

     

    If the individual is in the Negative Pole, there will be no effort to understand. If the individual is working through a personal process and is simply being difficult for those who have a different process, then it is likely not the Negative Pole.

     

    Those in Discrimination, even in a sustained Positive Pole of Sophistication/Refinement, can often be deemed "difficult."


    • LIKE/LOVE 3
      Report Article




  • WELCOME TO THE TLE LIBRARY

    This is a collaborative project that allows contributions from all members and is continuously growing.

    RULES FOR SUBMISSION:

    • contribute transcripts, excerpts, or articles based on your work and study with Michael through Troy
    • to ensure consistency and to avoid copyright issues, please only contribute channeling from Troy
    • please do not submit an analysis, interpretative, or opinion articles; only direct communication with Michael
    • take time to clean up, format, and edited properly so that it is easily readable
    • please format any chat transcripts so that Michael's words are clearly separate from any questions or comments in the transcript
    • please search and scan to see if your submission is already covered or submitted. We wish to keep any redundancy to a minimum

     

  • Recent Articles

×
×
  • Create New...