This material was pulled from a private transcript originally posted on 3/28/11.
In response to a question about a person for whom Michael provided no Essence Twin information when describing the profile:
Yes, this fragment is not mathematically paired with another fragment who would technically be an "Essence Twin," though her Essence is still mathematically connected to many who can act as surrogates, and fulfill any level of intimacy and lesson sharing.
In other words, every fragment has fragments with whom there is a mathematical resonance, which brings with it an intimacy and long-term arc of explorations, but what makes one an Essence Twin and another not an Essence Twin is the Casting Positions.
There is no other fragment in the other Entities that match her mathematical position who share the same Casting Position. Essence Twins ALWAYS have the same Casting Positions. In other words, in the 569th Position of the other 6 Entities, the Casting of the other fragments are not Artisan/2nd.
Or there may be a fragment sharing that Casting and that numerical position, but it is already paired with another.