Jump to content
  • Cadre Two Entity Six

    Janet

    This material was originally posted on December 29, 2012, as a private session transcript.

     

    Janet: I just received an Essence Report from Troy for my daughter Emma. In the report you indicate that she is first cast in cadre 2, entity 6. I have been told by another channel that this is also my entity, and recently we've been exploring how my position as last-cast on the first side of my entity is affected by interaction with wild cards from the first cadence on the second side.  I’m not sure how likely it is that the first and last cast on one side of entity 6 are both Artisans. Can you confirm that I am indeed in the same entity as my daughter? I’m rather sentimentally hoping this is true but I think it’s important to be set straight if it’s not the case. 

     

    MEntity:
    Though we know this information may evolve and change over time because the understanding will grow and change, based on the current understanding of the entity models, this particular Entity has 373 fragments with 378 Positions and the first "side" is entire Artisan.

     

    The "second side" is Priests.

     

    The "third" is a mix of Scholars and Warriors.

     

    There are 12 Wild Cards.

     

    Those who are the first of the Entity would slide into the Positions at the "end" of the Entity (on the so-called "third, or Energy/Beauty side). 

     

    Janet:  Oh my. That is fascinating. Thank you. Is the second side also incomplete and involving wild cards from the third side? 

     

    MEntity: Each "side" has 4 Positions to fill.

     

    Note from Janet: Other sessions have identified more than 12 wild card positions in this entity, including some empty positions that are not at the end of a side. 

     

    Janet: So all the wild cards are to fill positions at the ends of the sides. Is this true of all wild cards or do some fill positions in the midst of a side?

     

    MEntity
    Positions are filled relative to those who follow in the count behind them. Think of the Positions as abhorring a vacuum, pulling in those who start the next count.

     

    The "empty" Positions can often be peppered throughout an Entity.

     

    Janet: I have that. For 6th entity, wild cards fill empty positions at end of the side. Is this true of all entities where wild cards exist?

     

    MEntity: No, this is specific to this particular Entity and its arrangement of fragments and Positions.

     

    Janet: Thank you. Is there anything else you would like to say about this entity that would be useful to those of us who belong to it?

     

    MEntity
    We have nothing urgent to add, but we can say that one consideration for the life of those who come from this entity is that they will always be eclectic meeting grounds for a number of people from surprisingly disparate paths. It would be helpful to consider that there is no way to really make the life of one from this entity homogenous.

     

    The fragments from this entity are magnets for pivoting and facilitating others.

     

    They are often the "revolving doors" of the Cadre.

     

    Many are in positions to be touchstones against which others judge themselves, or are judged against by the entity member.

     

    We do not intend for our words to sound ominous, but to help alleviate taking it personally when a fragment might come and go from the life in a way that is confusing or painful. Sometimes members from this entity will be an unwitting resource or respite or directional beacon, and then a person needing that simply moves on.

     

    Janet:  I think I have experienced that. 

     

    MEntity
    We think you have, as well, but your current life tends toward the touchstone aspect so that there tends to always be a dance of self-measurement, self-monitoring, and watching and assessment of others, that helps to define and redefine standards that are useful, not harmful.

     

    Fragments from this entity tend to be Resource Beacons, Pivotal (redirections) Beacons, or Touchstone Beacons, but almost always attracting those who are trying to "get somewhere."

     

    This tends to draw members from the entity together in small pockets so that there is a kind of comfort and stability of familiarity.

     

    Whereas other entity members may incarnate in a way that they might seek to find one another at some point, entity 6 members tend to aim for blood lines that automatically keep them close, because entity 6 members tend to be more stationary.

     

    They are scattered about, but in pockets.

     

    Janet:  So it would not be uncommon to find multiple entity members within a family?

     

    MEntity
    We would not say that it is uncommon, but as the soul grows older, the necessity for bloodlines tends to fall away, because the older soul tends to "remember" Essence fairly early in the life, and thus finds their Agreements and friends on their own.

     

    However, when the theme of an entity is more stationary, and acting as posts for other moving fragments, it can be helpful to lock into bloodlines that help keep at least a few familiar faces nearby, so to speak.

    Edited by Janet


    • LIKE/LOVE 6
      Report Article



  • WELCOME TO THE TLE LIBRARY

    This is a collaborative project that allows contributions from all members and is continuously growing.

    RULES FOR SUBMISSION:

    • contribute transcripts, excerpts, or articles based on your work and study with Michael through Troy
    • to ensure consistency and to avoid copyright issues, please only contribute channeling from Troy
    • please do not submit an analysis, interpretative, or opinion articles; only direct communication with Michael
    • take time to clean up, format, and edited properly so that it is easily readable
    • please format any chat transcripts so that Michael's words are clearly separate from any questions or comments in the transcript
    • please search and scan to see if your submission is already covered or submitted. We wish to keep any redundancy to a minimum

     

  • Categories

  • Similar Content

    • Kasia
      By Kasia
      OMW - Apr 3, 2011 - Personality Pathways
       
      Channel: Troy Tolley
       
      MEntity:
      Hello to each of you. We are here now. We will share with you some insights about using the Personality Overleaves in a way that may make them more useful and applicable when examining behavior patterns and shared dynamics between yourself and others.
       
      What we will begin with then is how your Personality was "designed" in the first place by your Essence.
       
      The process of creating a Personality evolves over lifetimes, but begins in the Infant Soul Age as "throwing together" anything that is more compatible with the defaults of the Essence Design already chosen.
       
      For instance, a higher "Female" Energy fragment would tend toward beginning lifetimes, literally, in a female body.
       
      The higher female and higher frequency Overleaves tend to be the Exalted Overleaves, and the higher male and lower frequency Overleaves tend to be the Ordinal Overleaves.
       
      Depending on the combination of Essence Role, Frequency, and Energy Ratio, your "defaults" would be determined.
       
      If there are extremes in that Essence design, then the Assimilative Overleaves come in handy.
       
      Over lifetimes, this process becomes far more comprehensive because there is more information and experience to consider in the making of a Personality.
       
      Over lifetimes, this process becomes far more comprehensive because Essence begins to define certain patterns of exploration and interests, not only based upon its accumulation of experiences gathered through the Personalities, but because there are certain "wishes" to fulfill for some Personalities.
       
      This process also becomes far more comprehensive because the positions within the Entity become fleshed out, so to speak, and the contributions to the Entity become important as an intention, rather than as a byproduct.
       
      Over the course of lifetimes and Soul Ages, the "core" of Personality will shift.
       
      The "core" of a Personality can always be any Overleaf, but there does tend to be a consistency in what is the core relative to Soul Ages. The core of a Personality can be the Goal, Mode, Attitude, or Body Type. By "core," we mean it tends to be the leading Overleaf for that Personality around which all other Overleaves become dependent. The core is what "feeds" the other Overleaves, if you will; the hub around which the other Overleaves revolve or extend.
       
      As the soul grows older, its choice of core becomes far more flexible, but the consistency is still set enough to consider it worth knowing the correlations. The MODE is the core of most Infant Souls; the ATTITUDE is the core for most Baby and Old Souls; the GOAL for most Young Souls; and the BODY TYPE (and by extension, Centering) for most Mature Souls.
       
      The Mode, by the way is usually the Core for most fragments who host Transcendental Souls, while the Goal is the Core for most fragments who host the Infinite Souls.
       
      We will pass over the "reasons" for all of this for now so as to get to the more applicable information, but can discuss the details as time permits.
       
      For most Old Souls, the core then is the Attitude.
       
      Keeping in mind that what we say for the Old Soul can be applied to the other Soul Ages and their corresponding Cores, we will elaborate.
       
      We have said before, without this background elaboration, that the Attitude is the core of the Personality, and for the Attitude to fall into the Negative Poles means that the Chief Features are far more likely to come forth, and the other Overleaves are most likely functioning from the Negative Poles.
       
      To bring the Personality from a state of Falseness and into a state of Trueness, the Attitude would have to be moved back into its Positive Pole, which would then feed into the rest of the Personality, in a kind of cascading effect, giving rise to the Positive Poles in the other parts of their Personality.
       
      While it is always helpful to understand the Poles for each Overleaf, and how to bring each into the Positive Pole if necessary, the "short cut" is always through the movement of the Attitude back into its Positive Pole, particularly for the Baby and Old Souls.
       
      Unless, of course, your Personality is an anomaly among the tendencies.
       
      Understanding your Core means understanding your primary platform or navigational tool for living the life.
       
      For those who have the Attitude as the Core, it would mean that the life is primarily built upon philosophical platforms, and navigation is done through how experiences, people, and events align with or conflict with your Attitude/Philosophy.
       
      For the Baby Souls, this tends toward like-mindedness and absolutes, whereas the Old Soul tends toward challenges and flexibilities.
       
      The "manifested" Soul Age can tend to throw the emphasis of a Personality into a different Core, which is part of the process toward wholeness in the Internal Monads; aligning oneself back to one's core.
       
      Before we continue into more details, we will take a few questions regarding what has been shared so far, if there are any.
       
      QUEUE OPEN FOR QUESTIONS
       
      [Oscar] you mentioned "...the positions within the Entity become fleshed out, so to speak, and the contributions to the Entity become important as an intention...", would you elaborate on how that works exactly and how that works for wild cards?
       
      MEntity:
      The Positions within the Entity are chosen by Essence (and to say "within" is not quite a literal term, by the way), and along with those Positions come general functions for the entity. Those general functions are a learned process, and not something that just happens because of a positioning.
       
      We will share an analogy:
       
      Imagine a bus load of fragments who have discussed along the way what each is excited about, afraid of, worried about, and feels strongly about experiencing at the amusement park toward which they are headed.
       
      Everyone has chosen a "seat" in the bus that corresponds to what each has already decided fits what it thinks he would be interested in, and good at, collecting for the bus load of friends.
       
      These positions are based on uncountable cycles of the universe and the capturing of various universal experiences relative to incarnational cycles.
       
      But for the sake of simplicity and our amusement park analogy, we will say that one fragment has decided he is in charge of collecting memorabilia, and another is in charge of taking polls, and another is in charge of sampling foods, etc.
       
      Every other fragment will also collect memorabilia, take polls, and sample foods, but this particular fragment in this chosen Position will be the one to which the other fragments "report" their experiences, and that particular fragment may have a theme with an emphasis on his function.
       
      By "fleshed out," we meant that each fragment then decides and learns how it best handles their function.
       
      Some will collect from the other fragments and update records for the entity only between lives; others will seek to find those who are focusing on experiences that are relevant to his function during the lifetime and create a stream of updating via various methods (dreams, meditation, daydreaming, etc).
       
      Some will find ways of organizing the data, while others will "pile it up," etc.
       
      Eventually, each position will bring his function/records from the park and back onto the bus, and then the process of organizing ALL of that begins.
       
      The "wild cards" tend to have between 2 to 7 functions/positions within the entity, with an emphasis on one of them.
       
      The task for the wild card then is to create its own system for managing these additional functions/positions, and this can tend to get rather chaotic in the earlier soul ages, and come together in the later soul ages.
       
      Wild Cards, ironically, become some of the most-focused, streamlined, and tunnel-visioned of all fragments in the entity during the older soul ages.
       
      [TimW] What is the best way to validate where one's "core" focus is? For instance, if my attitude is spiritualist (which I'm still seeking to validate), how would this look different if it is the core focus from when it is not?
       
      MEntity:
      The first consideration for validation would be in terms of how the life is being "built." Regardless of all of the nuances, is the life being built from your Ambitions (goals), your Philosophies (attitudes), your Relationships (modes), or your Behavior (body types).
       
      All of these will be involved, of course, and depending on various contexts and where one is with the Internal Monads, any could be emphasized, but there would tend to be an underlying, obvious theme for those who are self-observant.
       
      Where you life is RIGHT NOW gives one an idea about the core that it has been built from.
       
      Is it primarily actively ambitious, primarily philosophical, primarily relationships, primarily behavioral (empathic, assimilative).
       
      We are not finding the "right word" for the Mature Soul core as it relates to the Body Type, but we will eventually get that through. For now, we will refer to it as Behavioral, as this is how we will umbrella the concept of assimilating empathy.
       
      To put all of this another way: what matters MOST to you on a more regular and private basis? the accomplishments of the life; the interpretations of life; the relationships of life; or the way life treats you and you treat life?
       
      The answer for most of you will be that all of these matter, because you are Older souls, but there is one that should stand out as the most obvious and consistent, especially in your private navigations.
       
      The core then is around which all of the others revolve.
       
      For most Old Souls, the way life is interpreted is the core, and then relationships, ambitions, and behaviors revolve around that.
       
      As we are sharing new information through our channel, we ask now if this is making sense to you?
       
      [ClaireC] Could you elaborate on "manifested soul age can tend to throw the emphasis of a Personality into a different core"?
       
      MEntity:
      Over the course of a lifetime, the emphasis of core will evolve, eventually to align with the true core.
       
      This process of alignment is the same process for manifesting Essence, or True Personality.
       
      If one is in his teens and working through the 3rd Internal Monad, his emphasis of core may have his Goal of the Personality leading him.
       
      Everything, then, would be a matter of whether he is accomplishing that Goal, or taking on the challenges relative to that Goal.
       
      However, if he is an Old Soul, he would eventually find his Attitude a far more comfortable Core for leading the life, and calibrate the Personality around that Overleaf at some point.
       
      Until then, there may be a sense of being skewed, unsettled, restless, etc. because the emphasized core is not the true core.
       
      The process of returning to one's core is a natural process, and that process is not one that should be considered necessary to find shortcuts or that there is a standard speed.
       
      That process is simply "growing up," if you will.
       
      However, the older one gets in physical and psychological age, the more that gap between the emphasized core and the true core can become, and this can become problematic.
       
      If your true core is the Attitude because you are an Old Soul, yet you have emphasized the Body Type core (manifesting Mature) or the Goal core (manifesting Young), and you are in your 50's, it can become painful and internally/externally isolating.
       
      However, there are flexibilities in the Personality that emphasize the various Overleaves, and this is a healthy functioning of the Personality that does not shift its core. We will speak of this in a moment.
       
      When we speak of someone's "manifested" soul age, we are referring to a sustained emphasis, and not just a flexibility of focus for various contexts.
       
      So the farther away from ones technical soul age one is "manifesting," the farther away one may be from his core, as well, and the less comfortable and aligned within and without one might feel.
       
      We will continue with the topic now.
       
      Over the course of lifetimes, your Essence creates your Personalities with more information, experience, and intentions, and that is reflected in the choice of what Core Overleaf is first chosen.
       
      In that process, the Core Overleaf becomes the "spokesperson," if you will, for the rest of the design of the Personality.
       
      This may be difficult to imagine, and we are limited by analogies here, but we will try to convey the process.
       
      Essence would choose the Attitude, first, for example, and so it is that the Spiritualist, for example, is then informed by Essence as to what the plans and intentions and Karma etc. are for the life ahead.
       
      The feedback from the Spiritualist is then considered for which Overleaf is chosen next.
       
      This naturally changes the Personality immediately, and that combination now chooses the next Overleaf.
       
      This second Overleaf chosen is the Support Overleaf.
       
      The third Overleaf is the Seed Overleaf.
       
      The fourth Overleaf is the Navigational Overleaf. As this is new information for our channel, other terms could be used, such as the Correctional or Calibrational Overleaf.
       
      The Support Overleaf does whatever the Core Overleaf leads into and adds to its emphasis, and generally supports the entire Personality.
       
      An example: a Spiritualist interprets life as a spectrum of Possibilities, and in its positive pole will Investigate those Possibilities; if that person has his Goal of Acceptance as a Support Overleaf, then the Positive Pole of Agape would embrace whatever opportunity/possibility comes forth from the life.
       
      If that same Spiritualist is in the Negative Pole and goes forward into experiences with unquestioned Beliefs, then Acceptance would support this with an inclination for Ingratiation, or doing what is felt to be necessary for accepting/being accepted.
       
      The Seed Overleaf is that Overleaf through which all experiences are then funneled into tangibility.
       
      For instance, then, the Spiritualist with a Goal of Acceptance has his Seed Overleaf as the Mode of Observation.
       
      This would translate into the life primarily being built from philosophies and perspectives, or the interpretation of life, and then supported by the accomplishments or actions of the Goal, and then manifested or played out in Relationships.
       
      In other words, the results of the efforts of the Core and its Support could be checked against how well Relationships are going, and what is going on in them, the health of those relationships, etc.
       
      In this case, if the Core and Support are in the Negative Poles, then the Relationships/Mode may very well be, as well, and Relationships may be experienced as having a sense of isolation, lack, distance, ineffectiveness, etc. as Observation is in Surveillance, or watching, but not living.
       
      In this case, the Calibration Overleaf would be the Body Type, and it could be that the health becomes a factor in how one processes, removes, or corrects the events, situations, or relationships, etc.
       
      In the example above, it might be that the Body Type that manages the health of the body is Venusian, and if the Core, Support, and Seed are in the Negative Poles, then the health may fall into "sloppiness," or a rather chaotic collapse that forces attention to it as a means for correction, removal, or full processing.
       
      We would like to check in here to see if we are conveying this information clearly enough. Is this pattern of the Personality making sense so far?
       
      [TimW] yes, thank you
       
      [Jill] yes
       
      [Oscar] yes 😃
       
      [Mstudent_al] yes, very
       
      [Maureen] yes - but complex 🙂
       
      MEntity: We will continue, then.
       
      [ClaireC] yes, very much so
       
      MEntity:
      As each of you experience your life, you will have these patterns of Personality that are core patterns, but there will be certain contexts that require flexibilities, and while this will never usurp your core patterns, the flexibility comes in handy for new experiences.
       
      The Overleaf that takes the lead in projects and when working with others sharing an intention that seeks tangibility is the GOAL.
       
      The Overleaf that takes the lead in social situations and especially when first introducing yourselves is the ATTITUDE.
       
      The Overleaf that takes the lead in relationships and especially when the intention is intimacy (and not limited to romantic intimacy, of course) is the MODE.
       
      The Overleaf that takes the lead in bonding and creating common grounds through which experiences can be mutually shared is the Body Type.
       
      Understanding these various contexts of emphasis can help in these various contexts.
       
      Knowing that upon first meeting someone, regardless of his or her Core, you will most likely share your own, and "meet" his or her, Attitude, first, can be enlightening.
       
      Knowing that it might take up to three exchanges for the Modes to become involved can be helpful for when it seems that you and the other person suddenly begin revealing a different level or facet of yourselves.
       
      Knowing that your Attitudes and Modes may have to be set aside for a project and that your innate skills as relative to your own GOAL are most necessary for that project can help one to not take things personally and to focus on the tasks at hand.
       
      Knowing that being around each other in shared physical space, and how that is played out, is a vital factor in how well you can share common ground and process experiences together can be quite helpful.
       
      We will refer to these as Contextual Cores.
       
      These do not lead to patterns within, as the Core Pattern cannot be usurped, but the Contextual Core would be the part of your Core Pattern that is shared with others.
       
      For instance, if someone's Core Pattern is Attitude, Goal, Mode, Body Type, and he is in a project-oriented context, bringing forth the Contextual Core of his Goal, he will still first have chosen this project because of his Core Philosophy, and this project must in some way support that.
       
      [Oscar] Could you give the Core Pattern for each of us (Core, Support, Seed, Calibrational/Navigational Overleaves)?
       
      MEntity:
      Before we would share with any of you a Core Pattern based upon our interpretation of you, we would first encourage each of you to assess this for yourself.
       
      We can say that for most Old Souls, the Core Pattern tends to be Attitude, Goal, Mode, Body Type, but that is a tendency, not a standard.
       
      For Mature Souls, the Core Pattern tends to be Body Type, Mode, Goal, Attitude. For Young Souls: Goal, Mode, Body Type, Attitude.
       
      For Baby Souls, Attitude, Modes, Goals, Body Types.
       
      For Infant Souls, Mode, Attitude, Body Types, Goals.
       
      These, again, are tendencies, and not standards.
       
      All of this information shared today would require another round of discussion for elaboration, but this is a start.
       
      To help you in assessing your Core Pattern, we will offer a kind of phrase that may help:
       
      My life is built and shaped around/by my
       
      A) Philosophies/Perspectives,
      B) Ambitions/Pursuits,
      C) Relationships/Intimacies, or
      D) Behaviors and Health,
       
      which is supported by or challenged by my
       
      A) Philosophies/Perspectives,
      B) Ambitions/Pursuits,
      C) Relationships/Intimacies, or
      D) Behaviors and Health,....
       
      and plays out most obviously in my
       
      A) Philosophies/Perspectives,
      B) Ambitions/Pursuits,
      C) Relationships/Intimacies, or
      D) Behaviors and Health,
       
      and is sometimes/often corrected by, processed by, or altered by my
       
      A) Philosophies/Perspectives,
      B) Ambitions/Pursuits,
      C) Relationships/Intimacies, or
      D) Behaviors and Health.
       
      Using that crude phrasing, each of you might be able to share what you feel is your Core Pathway as you understand it currently. To make it easier, you can simply post the lettering associated with the various components.
       
      [Maureen]
      So the 'arrangement' of your Core 'package' would account for the order of what is 'cascaded' when one brings back their True Personality from their False?
       
      For example: A/B/C/D
       
      [TimW] I'm thinking mine: A/D/C/B
       
      MEntity: Yes, Maureen.
       
      [Elaine] acbd
       
      [Oscar] A/D/B/C
       
      [Martha] A/B/C/D?
       
      MEntity: For instance, if one has a pattern of A, B, C, D, and it has come to a place where the body's health (d) is reflecting the states of A, B, C, then the process of healing would begin with the Attitude, and then the Goal, and then the Relationships, before the body might show obvious recovery. This would not be the case in every blip of illness, but for those that alter the life in some way.
       
      [Maureen] I think I'm standard ~ A/B/C/D
       
      [Jill] ACDB
       
      [ClaireC] *A/D/C/B ?
       
      [Elaine] I am unsure about if I'm ACBD or ACDB
       
      MEntity:
      If you would like to be clearer, translate your post into more relevant correspondences:
       
      A = A (attitude),
      B = G (goal),
      C = M (mode)
      D = B (body type).
       
      So your pattern may be A, G, M, B in this case.
       
      Now that you have this information, you may take it and use it over your next week or so as you observe the patterns of your life, and see if your first assessment is still accurate.
       
      [Mstudent_al] I think i'm AGMB; B in behavior more then health
       
      MEntity:
      The information shared here is to allow for you to do the "work" part of "workshop."
       
      There is far more to this information that is available for elaboration, such as a more comprehensive definition of Core, Support, Seed, and Calibration Overleaves, as well as what it would mean for the Goal, Mode, Attitude, or Body Type to be in those positions. In addition to the elaborations, we will also mention that one's Core Pattern affects how one provokes or is provoked by another fragment's Core Pattern, and we can share more on that, later.
       
      Understanding your Core Pattern can help you to see the hows, whys, and whats of your experiences so that you can more effectively determine how, why, and what you experience.
       
      [Elaine] Karoliina received the following information regarding the process of solidifying of overleaves during 2nd IM. "During the 2nd Internal Monad, the first of the Overleaves will begin to manifest, and this will set the stage for the general arc of the entire lifetime. For instance, if the Attitude sets first, then the life would take on a more philosophical or Intellectual tone; whereas if the Mode is activated, then the life may bring more emphasis to the themes of relationships and intimacy, while the Goal would bring a life focused more on the gaining of experiences for the point of that Goal." Would that be different or connected to the core overleaf? Would the overleaf that manifests first during the 2nd IM always be the core overleaf, or not necessarily?
       
      MEntity:
      What you quoted from us is an elaboration without the context that we were able to share with you today. During the 2nd Internal Monad, the Core Pattern begins its arc of manifestation through the Personality, which may or may not set the stage for a challenging lifetime.
       
      If the Core Pattern is A/G/M/B, and the pattern initiates as G, then this becomes part of the process of the 3rd and 4th Internal Monad for alignment with the Core.
       
      [Elaine] So it is the core pattern which would manifest first during the 2nd internal monad?
       
      MEntity:
      ANY pattern can initially manifest, but it may not be aligned with the Core Pattern already in place; however, for the older souls, the Core is usually manifested during that time as it is already set.
       
      This is why it becomes a far more comprehensive project in designing and planning the lifetime the older the soul gets, because imprinting and too many random factors can affect the development of the Personality in ways that can be very difficult to recover from. But there are always parallel versions of the Personality that may do better than others, in terms of aligning with its Core Pattern.
       
      The farther the Personality from its Core, the less the Essence is allowed into the life, and Essence must "wait" until the life is over for the experiences to be collected from that Personality.
       
      [Oscar] You mentioned: "a Spiritualist interprets life as a spectrum of Possibilities." How do the other Attitudes interpret life?
       
      MEntity: The Spiritualist might be best understood as interpreting life as if he has never seen it before; the Stoic interprets life as if he has seen it all before; the Skeptic interprets life as if it can all be disproven; the Idealist interprets life as if it can all be improved; the Cynic interprets life the opposite of what it appears to be; the Realist interprets life as it appears to be; the Pragmatist will use whatever interpretation is most effective (or dogmatic).
       
      [Maureen] Is the pattern always the same - forwards and backwards - from False back to True and so on...i.e. A/M/G/B towards True and then B/G/M/A towards False? Is it that predictable?
       
      MEntity:
      Think of the Core Pattern in the same way that body, itself, processes life: food must be taken in and moves through a pattern before releasing what is not of use. So the Core Pattern is just as static, in terms of how it best functions for Essence to manifest.
       
      However, as with even the Physical Body, the process does not have to be entirely static, but those times when it is not, the alteration is usually to accommodate an extreme scenario, such as one who may have to have food provided intravenously instead of through chewing.
       
      One's Core Pattern is how one naturally uses the Personality for the processing of Life, and using the Personality in its inherent pattern frees it for manifestation of Essence, but only if it chooses to use this inherent pattern. No Personality is required to do so, and its happiness or lack thereof is not dependent upon it; it just tends to be "easier" when allowed.
       
      Ironically, it is far more effort to override the Core Pattern than it is to use it, but many people choose to create from themselves someone else' idea about who they should be, rather than naturally being who they are.
       
      To fall back into the Core Pattern is a great relief for the bank of energy each of you have for use in a lifetime, which is a finite amount of energy, by the way.
       
      If 40% of your energy is being used to sustain someone else' idea of who you should be, this is 40% of your energy that is not being used for creating/nurturing what it is you truly desire.
       
      To be more specific in response to your question, it is only the Core that is necessary for concern when focusing on bringing the Personality back into True Personality.
       
      So if the Personality's Core is the Attitude, then to focus on bringing the Attitude back into the Positive Pole would naturally cascade through the rest of the Pattern.
       
      There is not a real "pattern" for manifesting False Personality, except in that the predominance of Negative Poles describes the degree to which one is manifesting the False Personality.
       
      And if there is a pattern, it would tend to be that if the Core is the Attitude, and it falls into the Negative Pole, it would then cascade through the rest of the Core Pattern.
       
      The Pathways tend to be unidirectional, and tend to start with the Core, but because they are connected like electrical pathways, the "currents," technically, could travel in either direction in effect.
       
      The same could be said of the pathways of the body: inserting something into the anus can cause the mouth to respond.
       
      We will conclude here with you today.
    • AnnaD
      By AnnaD
    • AnnaD
      By AnnaD
      Frank Turner mature 5 Warrior cast Artisan C2E6 courtesy of @Martha.
       
       
    • Janet
      By Janet
      This material was originally posted by Geraldine on Ning TLE on August 15, 2009. 
       
      Note from TLE Admin on October 26, 2017: This material is the reproduction of a post by Troy that first appeared in 2003 in the TLE Yahoo Group [now defunct]. Here is Troy's disclaimer prior to posting this: "My disclaimer is that I was channeling this AS I was trying to learn about [Michael], so that can throw off some of the accuracy in details, but they are a start."
       
      Posted 4/23/03 On TLE Groups
      Here are some old Q & A to Michael about the Cadres & Entities:
      Here are the responses from Michael in regard to the questions posted. I hope you all find them interesting at the least. Thanks for participating!
       
      ********************** QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
       
      QUESTION: I would really like to know more about what happens after we die in regard to entities. I know we join back up with our entity before we incarnate again. But I guess I would like to know specifics. What do we do with our entities while we're there?
       
      MICHAEL:
      It is not necessarily true that you “join back up” with your Entity between lives. In fact, you are never separated from your Entity at any point, except in perspective from that of the Personality. Depending on Soul Age, there will be more or less contact with Entity Members incarnate, discarnate, or otherwise. Early in your Cycle, little is regarded between lives except how to get born again as soon as possible. As your Cycle continues and consciousness grows in Essence, your Essence will seek more meaningful contact with other Essences as you are between lives.
       
      You will seek “aspects” of those who are still incarnated at the same time (they do not have to be dead to communicate with them) for review or planning, and you will seek contact with those who will play parts in the next life who are not incarnate. This is not limited to any members of any Entity.
       
      Depending on the lifetime just lived, you will either integrate the lifetime and Personality as part of the dynamic of your Essence, or that lifetime remains “alive” and functioning within its own timeline. That lifetime, along with any other lifetime that is relevant to a theme, acts as a long-sounding tone, so to speak, and a new lifetime being created must integrate that tone into its plans. Lifetimes then “cluster” in terms of “chords”, usually in groups of 5 tones around a theme; the theme acting as a “chord”. Until that theme is complete, each lifetime and Personality is literally “alive” and full of various potentials within that theme.
       
      When the Grand Cycle is complete, the span of lifetimes is literally “heard” as a song.
       
      QUESTION: And what exactly happens when everyone in the entity is cycled off? Do we merge into one nebulous mass? What's the purpose of this?
       
      MICHAEL:
      When all fragments from an Entity are complete in the explorations of the Physical Plane, integration does begin. This is done in the Emotional Plane, or Astral Plane. Using the analogy of each Entity being a “busload” of fragments, then the “ride home” through the Astral Plane is the “telling of stories” of all lifetimes to each other.
       
      All Essences at this point have learned to relate to each other as separate and Physical and all of the ramifications of this, but the Emotional Realm of Essence is only remotely touched while Physical. Some dreams allude to the experience, but what is experienced as Emotion while Astrally-based and integrating your Entity is profound to a degree that a Physical Body could never truly process it.
       
      Each group of Roles within the Entity shares within itself, then as a collective Role will share with the other Roles making up that Entity.
       
      When this is complete, movement to the Causal begins.
       
      QUESTION: And, within our entities, I know we become close with a handful of other souls. But does this closeness carry over when the entity merges after everyone cycles off? Is that even possible?
       
      MICHAEL:
      “Closeness” with other fragments, whether within your Entity or not, remains, even when completely returned to the Tao. There will always be a “signature” that is identifying of all Sparks that are cast “from” the Tao.
       
      That basic signature, which is not the same thing as Essence or Role, will never change. There is a higher order that organizes the Sparks within the Tao, regardless of their undertaking a new Grand Cycle with a new Role, Entity, Cadre, etc. This higher order is how the Tao “breathes in and out” entire Universes. We, ourselves, still have an affinity toward many who are now our Students, but lived many lives with us while we were Physical. You do not lose this, though the way you may “feel” it now will certainly change.
       
      QUESTION: I was also wondering what kind of agreements the entities have. Are some entities slated to become teaching entities? What other kinds of "jobs" are there for entities to do once they've cycled off?
       
      MICHAEL: ALL Entities will teach. It is part of the process. The size of the population of the Students depends entirely on the choice of the Entity. How each Entity will teach is entirely dependent on the dynamic of the Entity and its placement within the Cadre. Each Entity will select a Parallel to teach in various forms, with at least one Parallel chosen for another incarnation as a Transcendental Soul.
       
      QUESTION: I would like to know what the names of the entities and make-up of the various entities are for cadre 2.
       
      MICHAEL:
      There are no “nicknames” for these Entities with any consistency to comment on at this point. The primary makeup for each Entity is following, but bear in mind that there may be more than these Roles involved in each Entity:
       
      Cadre 2
      Entity One: Warriors/Scholars
      Entity Two: Sages/Servers
      Entity Three: Priests/Scholars
      Entity Four: Kings/Scholars
      Entity Five: Artisans/Kings
      Entity Six: Servers/Warriors
      Entity Seven: Priests/Servers
       
      [Note from TLE Admin: Please see articles about Cadre 2 entities currently on this site. Information has been altered/updated since 2003.]
       
      This is an Artisan-Cast, Cardinal Cadre bringing great amounts of creativity and innovation to the planet over time for the rest of the Energy Ring. Much of its contribution over time has been played out in Politics and Music. This is Knowledge Position in the Energy Ring granting the Energy Ring some of its greatest advisors across time, whether through example, questioning, facilitating, etc. This is not always in a “flattering” light as some of your recent Politicians in the more dramatic spotlight have come from Cadre 2.
       
      QUESTION: Also, since most of the folks on the list are cadre 1, I find that I often feel drawn to people of entity 3. I know there is a certain bleed-through between the same entities of different cadres and I wonder how that works, why that happens.
       
      MICHAEL: Links between fragments and some Entities are created simply by sheer experience, while other links are mathematical. Your link to Entity Three is due to your personal study of alternative perceptions of reality. Entity Three from Cadre One is held as the specialists in “seeing” the world through innocent eyes or at the very least, quirky enough to be considered independent from the impositions of environment. You adore this as Essence and this lifetime’s Personality agrees.
       
      Mathematical/Musical links between Entities are formed previous to any incarnation and stand as links between fragments who are Essence Twins.
       
      QUESTION: How long have the two cadres been incarnating on this planet?
       
      MICHAEL: Nearly 6,000,000 years; measured by Earth’s rotation around your Star.
       
      QUESTION: I'm really curious about the history of our entities (Cadre One).
       
      MICHAEL: To delve into the histories of each Entity would be a grand topic that this channel will have to pass at this time by his choice. We can suggest the topic continue into your next month with this as an exploration, but eventually you will have access to the information, regardless.
       
      QUESTION: What are the reasons behind the choice that the Entity we know as Michael would form teaching agreements with our Entities and Cadres?
       
      MICHAEL: It is the nature of all Entities within Cadre 11 of an Energy Ring to form teaching agreements with the following Energy Ring.
    • Janet
      By Janet
      MICHAEL SPEAKS
      121309
      Open Floor
       
      [Michael Entity] Hello to each of you. We are here.
       
      [QUESTION] Hello, Michael. 1)Who was this mysterious Mikao Usui who created the modern Reiki System? 2) What were his overleaves? 3) From your perspective, what is this REIKI or SPIRITUAL ENERGY that practitioners channel...4) what are the factors that have made this practice so popular around the world?
       
      [Michael Entity]
      For purposes of this format of exchange, we will share a brief response to each of the questions.
       
      The fragment known as Mikao appears to be a Warrior-cast Priest who recognized the validity of subtle energies and their capacity for being harnessed and directed. The energy that is harnessed and directed is not unique to the practice called "Reiki," but that system does help bring tangible tools to the process of using the energy. The same energy could be said to be shared from the exchange of laughter, awe, and happiness or pleasure.
       
      The modern system referred to as "Reiki" has become highly political and hierarchical in many circles, but we see that this has begun to deconstruct and return to its roots in many ways. Both the political structure and this deconstruction have their flaws.
       
      The political structure is a false hierarchy of learning that can bring about false healers who have gained credibility by simply paying enough money to buy a label. The deconstructing of this political structure requires little more than reading a book and can bring about delusional exchanges of "healing" that are little more than nice thoughts. Knowing the extremes of that spectrum, we would say that the only valid method for developing the strengths capable for use of energy in this way would be through practice, feedback, and tangible evidence of effect.
       
      The energy that is used is the basic "life force" of your universe. This life force could be understood through the analogy of a computer screen that allows for a cursor to move through the pixels and light, showing up as itself wherever it is, but literally connected entirely to everything on that screen. "Reiki" then could be said to be that affect that allows for the repair of a pixel, or pixels, bringing light back, so to speak, to areas of the screen that have dimmed or have gone out.
       
      In the same way that a piano can be played by any of you, so can Reiki (or energetic healing) be practiced. However, to continue the analogy, in the same way that one can simply peck at the keys, or pound on the keys to make noise, so too can some "healers" generate energy that has no effect, or only brings irritation. And in the same way that one can learn to play a piano beautifully on one's own, through an instructor, or through a hierarchical fee plan, so can healing be learned. The piano and the noise it generates is up to the player, and how that player learns to play is up to the player. It just so happens that "Reiki" has come to be a recognizable system, and for that matter can lend itself as a strong platform for the work that a healer might wish to do.
       
      No direct harm can come from false healers, but irritation, and distraction from legitimate care, can certainly have effects.
       
      [QUESTION] I'd like to know something about the Lemurians and their cycle off that you mentioned to me as happening 35,000 years ago. You said they were “a sentient species who cycled off en masse”, and that this was profound for my cadre (c1).
       
      [COMMENT] I'd like to know how an entire sentient species can have simultaneous cycling-off
       
      [QUESTION] did we run them off?
       
      [Michael Entity]
      The Lemurians were a species that were of a finer density than your human bodies, and some may have remembered them as "etheric," or as having "Light Bodies," but they were more like the luminescent "jelly-fish" of your ocean. They were a sentience living through very delicate bodies and this lent them to isolation and insularity away from other species. Their process of cycling off would be akin to how you understand a reunited entity moving from the Astral to the Causal in its evolution.
       
      Their species was few in number, relatively speaking, and their lives were of great length, structured tightly in groups, so that large groups would reach a point of cycling off at the same time. We say "at the same time," but we mean this in terms of relative perception of time; it could take several years for the exit of a group, but once it started, it was an exponential process. Some of our students who remember the Lemurians were deeply affected by the exit of the last of the Lemurian groups.
       
      [QUESTION] So Ramtha was a jellyfish-like entity?
       
      [Michael Entity] No. Ramtha is a conglomeration of the channel's own higher self (Essence), her ego, and then some legitimate guidance by a cycled-off entity of Human sentience. We wish to point out that the conglomeration we describe as "Ramtha" does not diminish the value of what is taught to those who find it meaningful. It just happens that the Sage/King entity enjoys theatrics as their Medium.
       
      [QUESTION] So, they weren't going through the Soul Age Levels while on earth -- but were more like using earth in an Astral-like manner?
       
      [Michael Entity] No, they progressed in Soul Age as any other sentient species extant, but progressed in groups so that the cycling off for each was in conjunction with masses of other fragments.
       
      [QUESTION] So we did have some interaction clearly, even if they were isolated?
       
      [Michael Entity] Yes, there was a great deal of interaction between your species, but in measured and highly-structured ways.
       
      [QUESTION] oh, so none of us ever actually had lives as lemurians?
       
      [Michael Entity] Not that we know of. To switch bodies in such a way is not something that is very appealing to sentience, unless there are hundreds of years of integration and communication between the species.
       
      [QUESTION] Contrary to what Michael teaches I feel that sometimes my guides tap into my future, sometimes seemingly to a future that just happens, please comment on this phenomenon.  Time is an illusion is it not?
       
      [Michael Entity] What you experience is not in contradiction to our teaching, and we understand what you describe. We refer to these as Sequences and Vectors. These are events that, when lined up and feasible, fall like dominoes in a momentum toward an end. It is not predestination, anymore than a line of dominoes are guaranteed to fall perfectly every time, but the lining up, or the Sequences and Vectors, do tend to bring about fairly predictable paths.
       
      [QUESTION] sequences?, please elaborate
       
      [Michael Entity]
      A Sequence is an arrangement of Agreements or Events that create a pattern toward an end result. A Vector is that "point of no return" so to speak, that is a mathematical momentum toward that end result.
       
      Time is only an "illusion" when you are not experiencing it. It is a disservice to pretend that the Physical Plane is void of the experience of Time. If you have Emotions, you experience Time. So while you, as Personality, must take your next steps in Time, your Essence does not have the same constrictions and can work to arrange probabilities in ways that are appealing to your Personality; that is, if the Personality is manifesting Essence. Even your Personality is not restricted entirely by the function of Time, as it has Imagination as a source for planning, memory, and choice.
       
      [QUESTION] Good afternoon Michael; Yesterday evening we were discussing the "close but no cigar" meetings between concurrents. I would like you to elaborate on what occurs when one of your concurrents dies...does the Essence's other concurrents "pick up" where that one interests, queries, lessons etc "leave off" this lifetime,in other words sort of an assimilation?
       
      [Michael Entity] In most cases, no. The lives of Concurrents are their own, and though Essence will absorb the experiences from all Concurrents, it does not shift the life of one onto the life of another. There would be little point to that. However, in some cases the Personality of one Concurrent becomes aware of the validity of the concept of Concurrents and that can open that Personality to exploring the life of another Concurrent in some way, either through Imagination, or through bleedthrough.
       
      [QUESTION] bleedthrough?
       
      [Michael Entity] Yes, bleedthrough; a natural exchange of energy that comes from intimacy. In other words, it is no different than the experience of feeling resonance with a past life when that life resonates to a current life.
       
      [QUESTION] a cosmology question :) - the Universe is said to be 14 billion years old. Recognizing the problem with 'time', when were the cadres/entities 'cast' out from Tao in relationship to the creation of this Universe? Before, during, or after? (I have been told my essence/soul is also 14 billion 'years' old -I am curious how this 'fits').
       
      [Michael Entity] Cadres and Entities are cast over and over within a Universe with every return to Tao, which includes the choice of your Essence's new Role, new Entity, new Cadre, etc for every Grand Cycle. The measurement of time for that Universe and its first casting of Entities is always relative to the Planetary System of the Sentience at the time of such a question.
       
      [QUESTION] the earth is said to be just over 4 billion years old so we were cast 'last' 4 billion years ago? Where does the 14 billion 'age' come in? or was this in relationship to a prior planetary system of sentience?
       
      [Michael Entity] What we mean is that if we were answering this question for another fragment in another planetary system with a different measurement of time, we would have to answer with a very different scale. In terms of time measurement as can be understood in any practical sense, we can safely say that your (and our) current Sentience is at least 14 billion years old, "give or take" a billion or so. Keep in mind, however, that your ROLE may not be as "old" since you have returned to Tao multiple times in Grand Cycles.
       
      [QUESTION] Since there are/were 3 of us present that are from Entity 6 of Cadre 2 may I have any Biographical information that you have easy access to along with perhaps a Theme or Task for this particular Entity? If that question is too broad, feel free to pick and choose what you think may be helpful.
       
      [Michael Entity] It could be said that a common denominator, or theme, among Cadre 2, Entity 6 is that of SENSITIVITY. This Sensitivity can show up in different ways that range from crippling sensitivity to profound healing capabilities. This particular Entity is "touched" by life and experiences in ways that are often difficult to understand by other fragments. This particular Entity is often seen as the "open wound" of the Cadre, where the greatest traumas and extremes are drawn in by the fragments. This openness to life in such a sensitive manner can also lead to an awareness of subtleties that, when harnessed and implemented, can come across as works of "miracles" or profound transformation for those within proximity of that fragment's life.
       
      [QUESTION] Since this is a 6 numbered entity, is that reflective in its Priestly energies in any way?
       
      [Michael Entity]
      It is true there would be "priestly" qualities inherent in the dynamic of any Entity 6, lending it a deep Compassion or a strong Zeal. In addition to that mathematical dynamic, Entity 6 emphasizes the spectrum of experiences between the negative pole of Connection and the positive pole of Harmony. In Connection, the fragments of any Entity 6 may find themselves in positions that pivot other lives, or that they may move from one support or social circle to another throughout the life, always drawing a line of connections among fragments or groups like a "connect-the-dot" exploration. In Harmony, the fragments no longer find themselves splintered among various parts of the life, and/or fragmented by relationships to various people in the life, but find that everything plays a part in an overall Harmony.
       
      There is much more that could be said, but we feel this little bit will help add to the understanding of the dynamics of this Entity.
       
      [QUESTION] am wondering about alkaline water. I've been reading about adding alkaline drops to water or getting a water ionizer. Is this just hype? Or is it a helpful, healthful concept? Water Ionizers, btw, are very expensive. Do alkalization drops do similar things--if any? P.S. I know our channel isn't thrilled with health questions. But I trust his ability to step aside.
       
      [Michael Entity]
      As far as we can see, most water is already alkalized to a degree that would have benefit, if benefit is valid. We do not see that this is the case, but may often be just the opposite if the alkalizing is high. There are several populations already ingesting high levels of alkaline water on long-term bases, and we see this as having little effect in terms of improved health.
       
      We think that this would be a matter of individual diagnosis in terms of an individual's "ph" levels, and that in those cases there are balancing remedies that might include alkaline drops, or antacid remedies. We do know that "ph" balance in the blood is important, and that this is a function of the kidneys in a way that can be measured. In that regard, it would be fairly easy to have a diagnosis, if it is of concern.
       
      The consumption of various greens and vegetables as a large part of the diet can help to minimize the acidity of blood that can come with age. It is not that alkalizing of water (or diet) is not important, but that it is important only for specific individuals in the same way that any remedy would be.
       
      [QUESTION] You've discussed "templates," and in an answer to me, you said, "Once that flexible template is in place, any Entity or Cadre can "play" the role for any group or individual as a means to teach, giving rise to a multitude of variations." You said you've played a role as both Ra and the Delphi Oracle. Are you using a template or playing a role when you work through channels at this time in your teaching history?
       
      [Michael Entity] We no longer have to play roles or use templates, except through those channels who wish to speak on our behalf, instead of allowing us to speak for ourselves. We do not mind, though. In those cases, it could be said that we are, in fact, using a template, but not in the sense that we were speaking about in your quote of us from a previous exchange. Our "voice" is just as valid among those channels who speak on our behalf, when the speaking is reflective of our teaching.
       
      [QUESTION] How would you speak for yourself? What would that be like?
       
      [Michael Entity] When it is "our voice" vs the voice of the channel on our behalf, there is little discrepancy from the consistent build of our teaching, especially in a way that would identify a channel as unique to that discrepancy for any great length of time. There will always be new additions to our teaching in a way that only one or two channels deliver initially, but the valid additions propagate. This does not mean that those discrepancies are not valid as their own teaching, or that they are in conflict with our teaching, but it is one of the ways for discerning the authenticity of our "voice," if that is of interest to a student.
       
      [QUESTION] so is it just personal preference when we think something "sounds" more like you?
       
      [Michael Entity]
      How we "sound" is far less important than what is claimed that we are saying.
       
      We do have a kind of "checklist" for validation of our voice through a channel that any student can use for navigating the various channels, regardless of what we "sound" like. We will include this in the final transcript for this chat. This checklist would be one that does NOT reflect the validity of the information that a channel is conveying, as the information may have validity of its own regardless of its consistency or lack of consistency with our evolving teaching, but only as a means to discern the proximity and clarity of contact with us and our intentions.
       
      Navigating the validity of channels and their proximity and clarity of contact with us can be complicated; we have "channels" who actually do not channel us but who speak consistently and accurately on our behalf, and we have channels who work directly with us who distort the information to such a degree that this information only serves to distract from our teaching.
       
      The exploration of such topics as this can be "dangerous" territory for some, and it is not an exploration that can be undertaken accurately without a high level of intellectual and emotional maturity, as it can easily prompt the younger imprinting of hierarchy, competition, and conflict. When we say that it can be "dangerous territory," we are not speaking in terms of caution or concern, because with or without our suggestions for validation, the younger imprinting will find its ways into our circles of students. We were merely speaking to the concern that some may have about any process for validating the authenticity of a channel if one were to be in place. There is great fear in that regard, though our students will eventually find it to be an important, and non-threatening process, at some point when the younger imprinting is shed. In other parallels where we work with you, the process of validation is as important and as uncomplicated as validating a surgeon's claims.
       
      Without the process of validation, the door is wide open for us to work with a wide swath of students and non-students, but it minimizes much of the potential for actual learning. Without the process of validation there is also a consistent division nurtured among the various channels as certain groups form around the discrepancies that are unique to a channel, which then undermines much of the point of our teaching. Validation is vital on many levels, but only for those who choose for that to be a relevant ingredient in their process of learning and discerning.
       
      Many have not considered the possibilities beyond the current courtesies that increase such variations and gaps among the channels.
       
      We will conclude here. Good night to each of you. Goodbye.
       
      ***
       
      A BASIC CHECKLIST for validating the clarity, consistency, and presence of Michael through a person claiming to channel Michael, regardless of the "voice" being used:
       
      We will never tell you what to do. We will never predict. We will never speak to you in ways that only seek to comfort you. We do not use affectionate language as a means of socializing, or as a means to appeal to you. We will never shame you. We will never do the work of your life for you. We teach a philosophy that naturally encourages study and practice, if that philosophy is going to be valid, but it will not do the work of your life for you, or make your life easier. Only your study and implementation of the teaching can do such a thing. We refer to Past Lives as a means to increase your capacity for choice in the current life, but never as a means to simply explain away your conditions and experiences. We will never teach that your current life is a result of, or an imposition from, your Past Lives, but that your most relevant Past Lives are because of your current life choices. Our teaching is an evolving body that builds upon itself, but does not replace or displace itself. We do expand upon concepts that are often previously conveyed or interpreted as concluded, but this expansion is not a replacement or displacement, and will only add dimension that is consistent to the evolution. When we introduce a new aspect of our teaching, it propagates among our channels and does not become unique to any one channel for any great length of time. We do not make sensational, urgent, or conditional announcements. We do not do healing, or "energy work," as this is a form of interference and potential karma. We do not work with any other entity in any way as any means to communicate or convey our teaching. We come to all who ask, but this does not mean we are heard, understood, or clearly communicated.  We come to all who ask, but this does not mean that we come through any channel who claims he or she is channeling us. We and our teaching cannot be misrepresented because it is either us and our teaching, or it is not; we and the teaching are either heard clearly, or not. We will always trust that you will hear what you most need or want to hear. We will never restrict our communication to only what you want to hear, and we will never impose upon you what we see as your needing to hear. We cannot access private information about any fragment. Private information in the Akashic Records is as private as the individual Personality deems it to be, until that Personality deems it otherwise. Individual Personalities will always be the authority over their own information. Overleaves are not private information. Accessing the Akashic Records is part of our study, and your questions help us in that process.  You cannot ask your questions, or for Overleaves, too many times. We do not evade or avoid questions that seek to help a student in a process of validation. We do not require questionnaires, birth information, or photographs as a means to access your Overleaves; that is a tool for the channel, not for us. Our channels are never displaced by us, but only merge with us as a means of communicating for us. There will always be a percentage of consciousness of the channel contributing to even the clearest of information, accurately or inaccurately. Everything we teach extends from the premise that every fragment carries the primary tool of Choice. We will always emphasize the tool of Choice as your most empowering tool. We state that "all is choice," but this does not preclude the responsibility of learning how to choose in ways that contribute to you and your species evolution. We make the statement that "all is choice" as a fact of existence, not as a statement of permission. We are not out to save the world, have no interest in recruiting students, and do not find it necessary to alter our teachings in a way that allows for consumption by the masses. We do not expect you to take this checklist at face value, but we offer it as a means to bring to light the patterns of consistency that establish the strength of our proximity to you through a channel, keeping in mind that the lack of proximity means only a lack of proximity. It does not have any bearing on the validity, or lack of validity, of a channel's teaching or his or her interpretation of our teaching.
  • Recent Articles

×
×
  • Create New...