Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'non-incarnating'.
Found 1 result
Ask MIchael, September 2, 2018 Channel: Troy Tolley MEntity: Hello to each of you. We are here, now. We can begin. KaterPotater: Are we developing a talent or skill while incarnate that helps to build or strengthen a talent or skill used when astral, perhaps one that cannot be done fully when incarnate due the limitations of the material world? MEntity: Though it is fairly well understood that skills and talents developed while Physical serve as resources while Physical, it is true that skills and talents developed while Physical also serve as resources when non-Physical, or between lives. This is true both in terms of the persistence of Personality and of Essence. The level of acuteness and the variations of nuance that are gained when Physical in such a unique Space/Time context serves to refine skills and talent that then serve quite nicely while Astral. What happens is a circuit that weaves between the Physical and the Astral and creates themes of development and evolution for the fragment. The talents and skills you are developing that serve the Astral can often be seen relative to your impulses in life. The quiet and gentle voice that suggests directions and actions and interests and hobbies, etc. can often reveal that which will also benefit you and others between lives. We can elaborate upon this concept in further exchanges. ConnorB: Hello again Michael! Last December, you were sharing fascinating material about non-incarnating Personalities, or Unborn Personalities, and at the end of our discussion, you said, “These Personalities count in terms of lifetimes for Essence. We do not count them for our students because those lives extant are woven together differently than those that are non-extant. We can elaborate upon this in further exchanges.” Can you elaborate on this a little bit more? How are they woven together differently? MEntity: As we have said in our previous exchanges, once something exists, it cannot un-exist. This includes any Personalities that are generated in the Astral as experiments or as the result of various other necessities such as acting as a guide. These Personalities act as supplemental "lifetimes" to those that experience the Physical Plane. Those Personalities that are born of biology are uniquely different because of the immersion in that Plane. Imagine the difference between watching a documentary and being the subject of a documentary, or watching a movie vs BEING the movie. It is profoundly different in intensity and depth. However much a non-Physical Personality might evolve and grow and emphasize with being Physical, it will never know the threat of danger, pain, suffering, fear, guilt, anguish, worry, claustrophobia, etc. that sets the Physical Plane apart from every other Plane. However much these qualities are avoided at all cost while Physical, the mere existence of these dangers while in a fragile body that lives only once is a terribly unique and horrible and wonderful experience that no non-physical Personality will know except by proxy. That unique thread of survival and endurance while in a body that will bond with loved ones and live only once is something that ties each incarnation to each in a thread that is very different from other dimensions of existence. Again, we can elaborate upon this with further questions, but this is the basic difference. ConnorB: Thank you! Aksoren: I wanted to ask what are common characteristics of the members of Cadre 6, entity 5 MEntity: Cadre 6, Entity 5 could be said to be "THE UNTAMABLE." There is a theme here of being unexpected, contradictory, challenging, and even incorrigible. Cadre 6 is all about helping others to learn how to care for those who need guidance and kindness and care, while Entity 5 is about pushing the boundaries and capacity of those who seek to care and give direction. They are themed in being "untamable," but none of this is "bad," it is simply a way to experience the fine balance between responsibility and play. EricM: In past channeling, you've mentioned that Scholar essences tend to act as “hubs,” “routers,” or “drop-boxes” for their entities, in that they function to gather and/or upload the experiences of their entity mates into the collective record. Can you elaborate on this? EricM: For example, does this function have any effect on a Scholar essence's Personalities, or is it a totally separate function of essence? Also, are there comparable functions that other roles perform? EricM: update: i see the other roles functions have been covered in another session. We can focus more on how the Scholar function works and/or how an essence function affects their personalities MEntity: Yes, each Role will have certain functions for their Entity, and each individual/Personality will also have a function for that lifetime. Most of these functions that serve the Entity are processes that Essence manages and do not touch or affect the Personality, but the more conscious the Personality, the more aware the individual may be that this function and processing is occurring. For older Scholars, this often shows up as an exhausting effort to remain neutral on all counts and in all experiences. Though the state of neutrality is natural for the Scholar as Essence, the Personality does not have an easy time of being neutral. The older Scholar who is aware to some degree of this function and process of collecting and sorting data then will tend to experience conflicting positions in the life where he or she knows she should or could speak up, take a stand, offer an opinion, make a choice, etc., but feel quite painfully conflicted about having any right to interject. This is a result of having to process a great deal of data that would often conflict with one's own ethics, morals, preferences, etc. so when there is any degree of consciousness involved in the function as Scholar for the entity, these ethics, morals, preferences, etc., are assumed they must be neutral or the data could get skewed. As for the functions of a Personality for the Entity within any given lifetime, this is different from that of the Essence as Role. The functions of the Personality as they serve the Entity tend to show up in terms of Life Tasks. Juni: A previous question asked you to rate the total comprehensive human knowledge of the universe on a scale from 1 to 100. Your answer was 2. Using this same form of measurement, where are we on understanding the human body? Please comment on where the biggest lacks are, if time allows. MEntity: The comprehension of the human body stands at around 4. The greatest lack comes from the gap between Homeopathic and Allopathic and Holistic and Subtle Energy concepts that remain either in conflict or have extremes in misunderstanding themselves. All of these contexts for understanding the human body are valid and have strengths and weaknesses, but rarely are they seamlessly combined as a way to understand the body. Beyond these basic areas of understanding, there are the multidimensional realms that remain barely explored. This includes the various bodies that exist as stacked "within" and around every individual, such as the etheric, and emotional and intellectual bodies and the combinations of these that created the "mind." The next major breakthrough for understanding the Human Body looks to involve cellular regeneration and/or the tangible and quantifiable element of consciousness that animates the body. By "cellular regeneration" we mean that unlocking of the capacity to regrow organs, limbs, etc. MikeClev: Hi! There isn't a lot of info out there about the topic of Tri Bonds (three people who are in the same position on each of the 3 "sides" of an Entity). Could you please give some examples of famous or historic people we might know who were Tri Bonds, and how that relationship played into it? MEntity: One example of a famous Triad would be the literal triad of "stooges" known as The Three Stooges, made up of Larry Fine, Curly Howard, and Moe Howard. Their relationship was a constant dance of Positive, Negative, Neutral in their "real life," though the fictional characters tended to stick to one of the positions. Another example would be Steven Jobs, Bill Gates, and Steve Wozniak. Again, the dance of Positive, Negative, and Neutral are seen here. As well as that of Truth, Love, or Energy/Beauty. MikeClev: I thought Jobs and Gates were different entities? MEntity: There is a discrepancy in our delivery. We will remedy this in further exchanges as our channel is losing focus. We suggest marking the final delivery here as pending validation.