Jump to content
Erick

elements of the teaching

Recommended Posts

Erick

i have seen several sessions that have statements such as this one from michael-speaks-october-2-2005-open-qa

 

Quote

It should be noted that an entire element of our teaching has not been accessed, though it is from your question that it will come forth.

 

so that brings the question. what are all the elements of the teaching, how completely and accurately has each element has been accessed.

  • LIKE/LOVE 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Erick

with the last couple posts looking to judge interest in topics, i am not sure what i was trying to get at with this suggestion/question was well understood and may have gotten lost along the way; first being combined with a question that was more focused on the how of the teaching (the waves), than the what, and then seeming to being lost in the second pole that was focused purely on the waves of application. this question/topic was tying to be focused on the what of the teaching, looking to get Michael's take on a syllabus/outline of all the elements of they consider part of the teaching; the type that would be a useful complete outline and introduction to the teachings. then moving on to an exploration of an assessment of how well our questions had explored each area/aspect/element of the teaching (some what like the question of how much do we know about topic x that has been asked on the solar system) and how well/accurately they have been understood/comprehended (part of the feedback loop as they monitor the teaching used to make adjustments). i think this topic would likely end up create more questions than it would answer, and may help us understand other areas and perhaps get a more complete list of the topics that have been behind the various statements "we have more to say on" this topic spread throughout the various transcripts.

  • LIKE/LOVE 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Uma

It was my question at TLEGG 2017, and while Michael answered it in some respects, they did not reply to this:

Quote

It should be noted that an entire element of our teaching has not been accessed, though it is from your question that it will come forth.

 

So I am in favor of following up with this line of questioning. Maybe since 2005 when that quote is from, things have changed and that entire element has been accessed. In which case, we can move on.

  • LIKE/LOVE 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Janet

Please reference this article: The 7 Waves and Elements of the Michael Teachings. It includes Michael's response to the specific question listed at the start of this thread.

 

Although this content is posted as an OMW session, it was not an OMW: the content was given to Martha as a response to a personal question, and I suspect the content may have been discussed while participants were in the chatroom for an OMW. There's no other explanation for how it came to be posted in that location. 

 

So another session on the topic would need to take into account the linked article above plus Michael's response to Uma's similar question in last year's TLEGG: Ask Michael: TLEGG 2017.

 

What question would you ask, then, as a followup to the existing content? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Uma

I would ask: 

 

In 2005,  you said: "It should be noted that an entire element of our teaching has not been accessed, though it is from your questions that it will come forth."

Which element of your teaching were you referring to? 

  • LIKE/LOVE 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Janet

Actually, I just re-read the response about the 7 Waves and Elements, and I think Michael answered the question already. I think it's just the way Michael worded the initial reference that is the problem: it sounds as though an element can be accessed by asking the right questions, but I don't think that's the case. I think this is the clarifying statement:

 

MEntity: Your questions will continue to help unfold that Element of Application so that even the relationships that exist beyond the Physical Plane, such as those with Cadre, Entity, Cadence, and even Tri-Bond Mates, would be useful and not merely interesting.

 

Note that original context was a description of tri-bonds. Maybe we'll get more info in the casting topic in this month's Michael Speaks, since tri-bonds are connected to casting. 

 

  • LIKE/LOVE 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×