Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
DanielaS

Michael Speaks: December 2013

Recommended Posts

DanielaS

MICHAEL SPEAKS LIVE CHAT
Open Floor
December 22, 2013
Channel: Troy Tolley

 

[MEntity] We will begin with Royce, then.

 

[royce] Hi michael, I have a question concerning OBJECTIVE art ( as stated by gurdjieff and OSHO) vs. Subjective art. What is your description of the differences between them and what centers are utilized?

 

[MEntity]
In terms that differentiate the arts as Subjective versus Objective, one is a function of an individual's subconsciousness, various layers of processes, including those that tap into collective consciousness, yet all of which are interpretative and rather metaphorical. Whereas the Objective is utterly its own, standing as itself, with or without meaning, metaphor, and relevance.

 

When the Subjective is referred to as "soulless," it was not intended to mean "less than," but more to represent the perspective of Personality, the temporal. That art which is Objective is of Essence, or at least, of the Personality that is awake.

 

Subjective art represents something. Objective art represents itself.

 

Most of what passes as "art" is not of Essence, is "soulless," if you will. It is of Personality, and that is about as derogatory as saying that a single lifetime is the result of the choices of Personality, not necessarily those of the soul.

 

All of the Lower Centers are involved when Subjective Art is created. ALL of the Centers are involved when Objective Art is created.

 

[EricM]
There's recently been an impromptu discussion on the limited remaining resources of fossil fuels (oil, gas, coal, etc) and what the slow decline in their availability will mean to our civilization.

 

Because our civilization has many of its roots in such fuels, the decline of their availability, and the slow response to this decline, seems to be painting a difficult and relatively grim picture of the future.

 

Can you provide some brief ideas of the future probabilities shaping up around this issue, say within the next 50-100 years, and how society as we know it will be affected?

 

[MEntity]
The shift toward the shocking reality of declining fuels is within 5 years. It is not something that can be put off or ignored for much longer. Most alternatives that are in place today are not viable for replacing the scale that depends upon the current resources. It is not a grim reality ahead for most probabilities that we can see, but a definite jolt to most modern societies.

 

The better-case probabilities have leaps in technology, waste management, and the processes that depend upon the current fuels. If the replacement of those fuels are depended upon, then the probabilities are fairly grim, as you put it, but for most, there are innovations in HOW those fuels are used that makes the difference.

 

The capacity for greater storage and extension the life of energy for a number of dependent technologies makes a major impact on the time left for generating alternatives to the fuels that must, eventually, be moved away from.

 

In the process of advancing how energy is stored and used, the alternatives then begin to have far more impact, instead of simply being minor contributors to wasteful and inefficient processes now being used for a dominant, declining resource of energy.

 

[Maureen] Was Nelson Mandela (Warrior-cast Server, Level 6 Old) a Magnetic Server, a Transcendent Old Server (not Transcendental), or “something” else?

 

[MEntity] We do not know what the "something else" might be, but he was the former, yes.

 

[Maureen] a Magnetic Server?

 

[MEntity] Does that answer your question?

 

[Maureen] Yes it does. Thanks Michael

 

[MikeClev] I have a question about young kids' experience of life. I have read that kids have imaginary friends (my eldest does) and that some may even remember and describe past lives, and that this fades as they grow up. Sometimes they may tell us about things they see that we can't see. What are kids really experiencing? Is it all about getting parents' attention?

 

[MEntity]
It cannot be said that imaginary friends are all about getting parents' attention, though it can be for some, of course. In that case, there tends to be behavior issues that accompany the imagination that speak to the needs of the child and what is of necessity to address. Simply sharing with excitement one's imaginary friend is not an indication of anything other than that excitement to share.

 

For most children, the imaginary friends are a mix of the guides and one's own Essence. This can bring up access to Personalities in the history of the Essence, which would most likely be described as scenarios, not necessarily as a personality.

 

The imagination comes fully intact for most fragments as children, as this is how the Essence and guides work over time to bond with the body, and this open access can show up in ways that are almost literal in the sense of "invisible friends," to simply being a generated creation that represents any number of things relative to the psyche.

 

Think of children as having one foot in the Astral Plane at all times, so the blur between what is "real" (read: tangible, Physical) versus "imagination" (read: intangible, literal or symbolic) is quite wide.

 

[GeraldineB] Michael, yesterday we received the seven elements that prompted our learning in the Sage year of 2013. Could we have the 7 elements for the upcoming Year of the Priest, 2014?

 

[MEntity]

  • How willing were you to share in the enthusiasm that is expressed and exhibited by others?
  • What responsibility did you take for how you reflect the best of others back to them?
  • What responsibility did you take for what you saw reflected about yourself in others?
  • How willing were you to ask for help?
  • How willing were you to see that another may need help, even if not asked?
  • How much freedom did you allow for others to evolve at their own pace, regardless of your contributions from your own position in your own evolution?
  • How much intimacy did you allow in your life, even with your wounds, your shame? How willing were you to allow the wounding and shame of others into your life that is not your own? (counting as one element here)

 

We may elaborate upon these, of course, but these are fair for guiding one through the higher paths of 2014.

 

[GeraldineB] Thank you -- next Dec we might have some good answers for these :)

 

[ViP1] hello Michael. How would you describe the meaning of the term "conscience", and its applicability (or not) in navigating life?

 

[MEntity]
We might equate the term Conscience (as opposed to consciousness) to the sense of responsibility one evolves over lifetimes. The greater the conscience, the greater one owns his or her part in the equation of responsibility. This begins with one's self, of course, starting with the Physical, Emotional, and Intellectual Bodies, and then extending into the responsibilities one would have for the impact of one's choices and actions on others. This sense of responsibility, or Conscience, then would expand to recognize that one's choices and actions have consequences that may never be seen, but would still exist, such as they might be seen on the environment, on exploited and abused animals and humans, on the future, and even on Essence.

 

The Older Souls would tend to find Conscience to be the equivalent of Responsibility AND Compassion, then. The evolution of one's Conscience is the evolution of one's move from Anatomic to Atomic. Navigating the life then moves away from self-preservation, fear, and survival, and toward self-awareness, love, and evolution.

 

There are 7 circles of Conscience that one expands through, and we will share that delineation in another gathering.

 

[Janet]
Some time ago you spoke about the number 12 in relation to creation and merging of parallels and energy rings and even universes. You mentioned “universes stacked in groups of 12 that collapse and expand into one another to rotate out themes”.

 

Someone asked me a question about Grand Cycles the other day and it made me wonder: what's the relation between Grand Cycles and universes? Do there tend to be multiple (or perhaps all) Grand Cycles for a spark within a single universe or are universes created to serve the themes proposed for new Grand Cycles?

 

If a simplistic answer can't be easily obtained within 15 minutes, it's okay to pass on this question and I'll follow up at some future time.

 

[MEntity]
Grand Cycles of an Essence are specific to a Universe. All that you know of as "you" is of one Universe, even as it is full of parallels, layers, bubbles, and holes, if you will. A different Universe (in terms being used for this conversation) may have very different patterns and cycles that would be unrecognizable or impossible to convey to the consciousness that is of this Universe.

 

This even goes for the idea of how Universes are stacked. From "this" Universe, they are stacked in blocks of 12, but from a different Universe within that 12, the description may be very different in how it is explained.

 

So the number of Grand Cycles "you" may have noted as part of your exploration of Essence is relative to "this" Universe.

 

[Bobby] It's been about 2.5 years since I asked about Fukushima.  Would you be able to give us an update as far as how you see things and perhaps a most likely probability that we could chew on?

 

[MEntity] The most likely probability that we can see is that the effects of this event contribute to a great wave of global unity of effort toward responsibility for the well-being of the species and the planet. There have been waves before, of course, and this will be another. Within the next 5 years, the impact will have most likely have come to rather devastating obviousness, and it will likely draw together some great minds for how to move forward.

 

[Bobby] um, how devastating?

 

[MEntity] We are using that term to describe the response to the effects on foods, water supplies, and local genetics.

 

[Martha]
You gave VIP some detailed information recently on the Lunar body type. I’d like the same kind of information on the Venusian body type.

 

time permitting :)

 

[MEntity] That is a response we must put off in consideration of our channel, but we can always be asked again.

 

[Martha] OK, no problem!

 

[MEntity] Good evening to each of you, then. We will conclude here for now.

  • LIKE/LOVE 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...