20120916 OMW: The Circuitry of Overleaves

[Kasia]

OMW - Sep 16, 2012 - The Circuitry of Overleaves

 

Channel: Troy Tolley

 

(Note: The Overleaf Map is referenced in this transcript.)

 

[MEntity]
Hello to each of you. We are here, now. We can begin discussion on the topic of choice.

 

Though the Overleaves function as a whole, they do function in a similar way to how one might understand how the body works.

 

The body works as a whole, but, depending upon circumstances, various parts are of emphasis, serving the whole.

 

Understanding your body as a network of circuitry, all entwined in a way that is inseparable, but distinct in parts, is much the same way that your Overleaves can be understood.

 

What we will discuss, first, is the broader types of circuitry, and then move more into your variations.

 

We are using the term "circuitry" here for this workshop, but we do not mean to imply it as a permanent term within our teaching. It is simply a way to visualize this topic.

 

We have shared a bit about contextual circuitry in previous exchanges with our students, and we will review those, first.

 

The Personality always leads with one Overleaf, however swiftly the circuitry is ignited to cascade throughout the rest of the Overleaves. In various circumstances and contexts, various Overleaves will lead.

 

Those with higher Frequencies may find their circuitry "faster" than those with lower Frequencies.

 

CONTEXTUAL CIRCUITRY

 

The Contextual Circuitries are: PROJECT, SOCIAL, INTIMACY, and MEDITATION.

 

These are fairly straightforward in correlation:

 

When one is working on a project, the Personality will tend to lead with the GOAL. When one is in a social setting, one tends to lead with the ATTITUDE. When one is seeking or nurturing Intimacy, one tends to lead with the MODE. When one is in any state of meditation, one tends to lead with the Centering.

 

This is fairly easy to validate, as well.

 

Consider these contexts in the workplace, for instance.

 

When a project is the priority, one will tend to find one's Goal is challenged and/or fulfilled. When one is socializing, one may find that one's perceptions, philosophy, Attitude are challenged or highlighted. When one finds any eventual bonding, it is usually secured by the Mode.

 

When pondering any of this, the Centering is activated.

 

It will not matter what the project is, if your Goal is Acceptance, you may find that your capacity for Acceptance is challenged and/or fulfilled.

 

It will not matter the social situation, you may find your Spiritualism challenged, revealed, and/or highlighted.

 

And so on.

 

Those are the Contextual Circuits.

 

We will get to how the Body Type, Role, Casting, and Chief features get involved.

 

Before we move on, do each of you find a sense of validation for these contexts? Do you have any questions?

 

[Bobby] Yes, and not yet for me

 

[ClaireC] Ditto

 

[Maureen] yes -- I have a sense of validation for these contexts

 

[MariLynn] moreorless...

 

[GeraldineB] So, far those make pretty good sense -- especially Mode -- my relationships do tend to be more in observation mode, wait and see, few strong emotions (often in surveillance)

 

[Janet] Yes, but I have trouble imagining how my Power mode works (or doesn't work) for Intimacy

 

[MEntity] Janet, keep in mind that Power Mode is about Being Present. It is an Expressive Overleaf, not an action, so it will be about making your presence known in some way.

 

[Janet] I keep forgetting that. Thanks.

 

[MEntity] It is about owning your presence, being comfortable in your skin, "being yourself."

 

[Janet] The names of the overleaves sometimes give first impressions that aren't necessarily accurate

 

[MEntity] In other words, how you might evolve intimacy is in how much of "you" can be present, be permitted, allowed, without shame, silencing, etc.

 

[Maureen] Observation for me -- when I am intimate means yes -- I can truly "see" you.

 

[AnnH] So I would expect others to "see" me?

 

[MEntity] Ann, was that a question about Observation?

 

[MariLynn] thank you. well clarified. 

 

[AnnH] Yes

 

[MEntity]
Then, yes. For Observation to foster intimacy, each is expected to be willing to "see," to truly see one another.

 

As an aside, for another discussion, for intimacy to be fulfilling, it is key that one understand the Mode, as this gives insight into how you relate, and what you may expect of one who is growing closer to you.

 

[MariLynn] I have a similar question-hard to see how aggression mode bodes well for intimacy!

 

[MEntity]
For you, MariLynn, Aggression is an exalted action Overleaf. Aggression evolves intimacy by way of constant change, movement, activity, progress. One must be able to "keep up."

 

Intimacy is nearly impossible with someone who might wish to slow you down, tame you, or fault you for constant change of focus and directions.

 

The Mode also describes what is expected of others, as well, as a means of relating.

 

[MariLynn] yes! and it's been hard to find a partner who can, or wants to

 

[MariLynn] omg, yes!! concur!!

 

[MEntity]
MariLynn, that is okay, or, at least, can be "okay." It is a "King" Overleaf, and is not intended to foster superficial intimacy and relationships.

 

In addition to this for Observation, Sages inherently NEED to be seen, so Observation compounds the necessity for it.

 

[MariLynn] is this also true to a large extent if someone is sage casted?

 

[Diane_HB] I often notice myself using Observation in social situations, not necessarily Pragmatism.

 

[MEntity] Diane, keep in mind that Observation Mode is not literal observation. You may find yourself observing others, but this is Pragmatic for you.

 

[Diane_HB] I see

 

[MEntity]
Keep in mind that Pragmatism is a philosophy, a filter on reality.

 

In a social situation, that will either manifest as being Practical, in your actual expression of self, in your exchanges, and in your evaluation of the worth of those exchanges, or as Dogma, stuck in routines that you have learned as a way to filter people out.

 

[Janet] Clearly we need that future discussion about modes and intimacy.

 

[Janet] And maybe one about social situations and attitudes.

 

[MEntity]
Dogma may show up as an inflexibility in what you find worth talking about, if you talk at all. Many with Pragmatism will be those who walk into a social situation, and then quietly, eventually, exit and wonder why the attempt was even made.

 

Continuing.

 

[Diane_HB] Thank you, that makes sense

 

[MEntity] If there is a leading overleaf, then there would be a second, third, etc. in the circuit.

 

[Bobby] Is this leading overleaf indicative of which one developed first in the life?

 

[MEntity] Bobby, no. Centering is always developed first, in that case. It becomes the Meditative context of the life, then.

 

[Bobby] I think what I may be referring to is for example, K's daughter, you've stated that a certain overleaf was turned on first...

 

[MEntity] That would be one's core overleaf, and we will discuss that, next.

 

[Bobby] lol... ok

 

[Diane_HB] I thought the centering wasn't fixed until the 2nd IM, or are those different things?

 

[MEntity]
That would be correct, Diane, except that Centering is habitual, not fixed. The Overleaves are always present, even from birth, but until a fragment is approximately 7 years old, the Personality tends to be reflective of the caretakers, not the actual overleaves.

 

However, Centering tends to be activated upon mobility, and habitual at the close of the 2nd Internal Monad.

 

[Diane_HB] I see

 

[MEntity]
The sequence of the Contextual Circuit would tend to be dependent upon the expectations or intentions that are fueling or distracting the leading Overleaf.

 

For instance, to fulfill a Project, the Goal will lead, but if that Project is one that is for the sake of Relating, then the Mode might be secondary; or if it requires a lot of discussion and sharing, the Attitude may be secondary. If it is done alone, it may be from the Meditative Centering.

 

This secondary part of the circuit is vital for how the leading part is sustained in a Positive or Negative Pole.

 

For example, if you are obligated to a Project, the Goal will still lead, and if you are not "into it," you may distract yourself with your Attitude, or more Social contexts.

 

If you are evolving Intimacy, but your Projects are, ultimately, what you feel defines you, then you may be leading with your Mode in that relationship, but your Goal will draw you away from the intimacy.

 

Circuitry is always shorted out by dishonesty.

 

By "dishonesty" we mean it in a fairly clear way: that one is denying a truth by cloaking it.

 

For example, if you are obligated to a Project, it may be true that you are not "into it," but distract yourself with social contexts as a way to avoid that truth. Honesty would either not do the project, or it would call upon the social context as support, not distraction.

 

When a "circuit" is weakened, so to speak, the Chief Features come into play.

 

Can each of you think of examples for yourself? Do you understand this path of circuitry?

 

[Bobby] and others even

 

[GeraldineB] I can remember instances, but I got a lot better quite a few years ago about not committing to something I had no intention of doing

 

[AnnH] I think this happens constantly for me.

 

[AnnH] Since just about everything is "supposed" to be a social context for me.

 

[MariLynn] omg.....I DEFINITELY am in this right now. my 'project' is my obligation to be my father's FT caregiver

 

[MariLynn] and, I am NOT into it.

 

[Janet] Yes I see this. Work projects are often forced by circumstances rather than personal desires. But I can see this effect in past relationships as well.

 

[Maureen] I would rather burn myself out -- rather than not complete something I`ve committed to -- which is another problem!

 

[MariLynn] and, I can see this whole pattern as you've described....incl. the CF's have come up....esp. today

 

[Diane_HB] I used to do this A LOT but have gotten better at being aware of it now.

 

[MariLynn] ditto Maureen!

 

[AnnH] From reading this, I realize in my 20s my goal was career and not so much social.

 

[Maureen] ...which inherently shows a dishonesty with myself -- not good!

 

[MariLynn] another ditto

 

[MEntity] We are not speaking only to projects, but to relationships, social contexts, with secondary distractions or fuel, etc. We ask if you can see how this circuitry is at work in various contexts?

 

[GeraldineB] I've learned to take the flack for saying "no"

 

[Janet] Definitely can see it in all contexts.

 

[MEntity] Even in your Meditative contexts. Can you not find your "center" because you are distracted with projects, relationships, etc?

 

[ClaireC] Yes, Michael, and particularly how the CF's come in.

[Janet] Yup.
[Bobby] yes
[MariLynn] yes
[AnnH] yes
[GeraldineB] yes

 

[MEntity] The easiest way to determine if your circuitry, regardless of context, is weakened, is the question of whether you are DISTRACTED or ENTHUSIASTIC.

 

[Janet] Oh! Good one! I see that right off.

 

[MEntity] Enthusiastic here is not meant as prancing in pom poms and a perma-grin, but simply a "looking forward."

 

[Maureen] yes! (sorry ...I couldn't find my centering!)

[Maureen]

[GeraldineB] and for Distracted, I would say caught up in the "should" or "ought to" mode of thinking

[Maureen] (...that was a joke!)

 

[MEntity] Maureen, we know.

 

[Maureen] LOL

[GeraldineB] LOL

[AnnH] Yes, G. Very much.

 

[MEntity] Geraldine, that is fair, but the "should" or "ought to" would not be the distraction; it would be what the distraction tried to avoid or ignore.

 

[AnnH] Ah!

[GeraldineB] which is . . .I don't want to do this and will PROCRASTINATE to NOT do it

[AnnH] I often feel a lot of "I don't want to."

[AnnH] Heh, psych

 

[MEntity] There are plenty of "shoulds" and "ought to's" that are important and valid responsibilities, but distractions can make them difficult to fulfill.

 

[Janet] I think of my life in terms of whether I'm bored or not bored. I see correlation to distracted or enthusiastic.

 

[MEntity]
That would be fair, Janet, as boredom is a lack of presence and connection to Essence. If Essence is put at a distance, boredom tends to be a result. Often, when one is not enthusiastic, one shuts down the resonance to Essence.

 

We think that each of you see this clearly enough to benefit from the use of it in your choices and contexts, if you choose to apply this insight.

 

We will add here that if one is looking at the Meditative Circuit, it is beneficial to understand that this is the first of the Overleaves to be activated and sustained, even if it is changeable and habitual. Centering will always go back to a more precognitive state of being, and therefore, is a context of innocence.

 

In other words, when one seeks to find his "centering," or to meditate on his life, it is a return to innocence.

 

Techniques and methods are helpful for the meditative state and circuitry, but this circuit is the context in every instance when you are alone.

 

This is why aloneness is vital for the health of any Essence or Personality.

 

Though aloneness is given a bad name in modern, highly-populated and dense societies, it is vital.

 

Every time you are alone, you are leading with Centering, and that is supported or undermined by your distractions or enthusiasms.

 

[AnnH] I am sorry to make this all about me, but I find that emotional centering makes it difficult to get things done when I don't "feel" like it.

 

[MariLynn] I agree Ann

 

[Diane_HB] I'm intellectually centered and I still can't get things done when I don't feel like it

 

[MEntity]
So to help heal or strengthen the circuitry of your Meditative context, your return to innocence, it can be as simple as fostering enthusiasm as the secondary circuit.

 

This is a simple circuitry to address:

 

For those who are Emotionally-Centered, there tends to be a necessity to foster or allow enthusiasm for Relationships, or The Mode, as the secondary circuit. For those who are Intellectually-Centered, there tends to be a necessity to foster or allow for Social and philosophical interactions, or the Attitude. For those who are Moving-Centered, there would tend to be a necessity for fostering enthusiasm, or allowing, for Projects to be fulfilled.

 

In other words, the Emotionally-Centered can look at her Mode for how to relate to the self when alone. The Emotionally-Centered must be able to relate to herself as a means to be centered.

 

[Maureen] What do you mean by: ``The Emotionally-Centered must be able to relate to herself as a means to be centered.`

 

[MEntity] The Intellectually-Centered can look to her Attitude for how to interpret her life, how to interpret her place in society, as a means to return to her innocence and centered state.

 

[Maureen] in general or something specific?

 

[MEntity] Maureen, those who are emotionally-centered, when the Meditative circuit is weakened, can tend to wait or want for external inspiration to bring them back into a strengthened circuit of meditation and centeredness.

 

[Maureen] I see

 

[MEntity]
They must find themselves to be inspiring again, to relate to themselves again.

 

That is all that "relating" means: being inspired.

 

[Maureen] ..and can look for distractions through other people?

 

[MEntity]
Maureen, yes, the Emotionally-Centered can often think that if the right relationship would come along, all would be well with the self. They are most prone to co-dependence.

 

They can be distracted with relationships, which take them away from themselves, their centeredness, their innocence.

 

When the Meditative circuit is weakened, it can greatly affect how the life is digested, how you see and experience yourself, and how divided or fractured you are within.

 

Do each of you find resonance with this insight into these circuits, so far?

 

[Bobby] yes

[AnnH] Yes, sort of.

[ClaireC] Very much so.

[GeraldineB] yes -- it just doesn't "stick" with me -- it makes sense for the moment

[Diane_HB] yes

[Maureen] yes

[AnnH] There's an intellectual resonance, but I can't really get a hold of it.

[MariLynn] yes

 

[MEntity]
To help it "stick" with you, we suggest carrying with you the simple navigation between Distraction and Enthusiasm. The rest can be put into place after that.

 

We have described contextual circuitry, which changes in any given situation, but there is also a Core Circuitry.

CORE CIRCUITRY

 

This is how your Overleaves network when not being led by a context.

 

Though not an exact accuracy in all cases, it is easiest to assess your Core Overleaf by looking at how your various Essence and Overleaf patterns fall in the system.

 

Looking at the "map" that Troy has shared with you, note where your known Overleaves fall.

 

Include your Essence, Casting, Soul Age, and Level in your count.

 

[MariLynn] do you mean what axis is most dominant?

 

[MEntity]
Your final assessment would be the count of how many fall into Inspiration, Expression, Action, or Assimilation.

 

MariLynn, yes.

 

[MariLynn] ok. that's what I thought

 

[MEntity] Through a Sage, we can tend to be "wordier" than necessary, though we try to be succinct.

 

[Bobby] lol

[Maureen] LOL

[Maureen] actually Michael -- that was pretty succinct!

 

[MEntity]
Do not include your Chief Negative Features.

 

And only your Primary Centering.

 

[GeraldineB] Michael was peeking again

[Diane_HB] how about body types?

 

[MEntity] Only the Primary

 

[MariLynn] I didn't get the map but I have another chart....however what does old soul tend to fall into, ie. what axis?

 

[MEntity]
That would be Expression, MariLynn.

 

Share your dominant Axis when you are ready. If you find that there is a tie among them, we will address that, too.

 

[Maureen] I am 2-2-2-2- Michael

[AnnH] Assimilation

[Janet] Heavy on Expression axis; hardly any in the others (2-6-1-0)

[Bobby] Action, followed by Inspiration

 

[MEntity] We are unclear as to the numerical references, so we suggest either clarifying, or simply sharing the dominant, or tied, Axis or Axes.

 

[Maureen] I am even across the board Michael

[Diane_HB] I have 3 in Assimilation and 2 in all other axes

[MariLynn] I am super dominant expression (5) 3 ins., 3 action and NO assimilation....no wonder I'm on disability!!

[GeraldineB] I have big numbers 5s & 6s

 

[MEntity] There should be 9 elements considered in your assessment: Role, Casting, Soul Age, Level, Goal, Mode, Attitude, Centering, Body Type.

 

[Janet] Six of nine on Expression axis for me

[AnnH] I have only 1 action

[GeraldineB] I don't see anything for Level

[MariLynn] with my body types, I am not sure which one is dominant. I feel almost equal in mars/merc.

[GeraldineB] I have three and when Michael gives BTs, they're never in any particular order (or so I've seen them say)

[MariLynn] yes

 

[MEntity] For those with dominant Action, then the Goal is the Core Overleaf, and the Project Circuitry would tend to be fairly comfortable and appealing.

 

[ClaireC] Can someone enlighten me on how to read this chart?

[Maureen] OK -- Bingo!! I have a winner! 3 are in Action and 2, each, are in the other axis!

[GeraldineB] I have three in 5 and three in 6

 

[MEntity]
For those with dominant Expression, then the Attitude is the Core Overleaf, and the Social Circuitry tends to be the most comfortable and appealing.

 

For those with dominant Inspiration, then the Mode is the Core Overleaf, and Intimacy tends to come easily, or is most appealing as a circuitry.

 

For those with dominant Assimilation, the Core Overleaf is Centering, and the Meditative Circuitry (aloneness) tends to be the most comfortable and appealing.

 

If your elements are evenly distributed, you may tend to go with the default HUB of the Personality (which is different from the Core), and that is the Attitude.

 

The HUB of the Personality is similar to the Brain being the hub of the body, but not necessarily the main emphasis of development for an individual.

 

Understanding your Core Overleaf can help you to understand where most of your emphasis is on development.

 

It helps you to understand the state of your moods, your health, and your energy levels.

 

If your Core Overleaf is not fed enough, so to speak, the Personality starves, it begins to deteriorate in circuitry, which reflects in energy levels, health, and mood.

 

So consider this, in light of your Core: if your core is Social, and your life is mostly aimed at Projects, you may find it impacts you in ways that are challenging. If your core is Intimacy, Relating, and your life is focused on Social or Philosophical circuits, you may find yourself challenged in mood, energy, health. And so on.

 

[ClaireC] Michael, with 3 Inspiration and 3 Expression, which would be the Dominant Core?

[GeraldineB] Ditto Claire's question -- I, too, am 3 Expression and 3 Inspiration

 

[MEntity] Geraldine, we have stated that if your elements are evenly distributed, you may find that you default to the Hub (the Attitude).

 

[GeraldineB] OK ... I misunderstood

 

[MEntity]
That would mean that it is quite important to develop and feed one's philosophies in the life.

 

From this discussion, each of you can now see your Contextual Circuits, understand which Overleaf leads in those, and understand your secondary circuit as being a realm of distraction or as a fulfillment of enthusiasm. We have also shared your Core Overleaf, based on the distribution of elements that make up your Essence and Overleaves, and how this must be developed and tended to for your healthy mood, body, and energy.

 

If one's health, mood, and energy levels may seem compromised, take a look at your Core Overleaf, and determine if you are "feeding" it well enough, tending to it, nurturing it, giving it the experiences it may naturally desire, etc.

 

If one can move the Core Overleaf into some kind of strength of circuitry, it can make a great difference in the body, energy, and mood.

 

[MariLynn] that's for sure!! I thought I *got* it....and then I think I started overthinking it

 

[MEntity] We will conclude here for today. This is an introductory consideration for how the Overleaves work in more useful and meaningful ways beyond their basic definitions.

 

[AnnH] What if we're lacking in one area?

[Bobby] the final test will be given on the Causal and it will be open book(Akashic) har har har

[Diane_HB] lol

[MariLynn] lol Bobby!!

 

[MEntity]
Ann, where one tends to be lacking the most, one would tend to attract others who may have that area as dominant.

 

Or one would tend to generate experiences that keep that circuitry alive in some way.

 

(Note: In the editing process, I moved some lines around so they'd make better sense; also, there are a few that were duplicated -- again, to give clarity glb)

[Uma]

On 5/26/2016 at 11:11 PM, Kasia said:

MEntity] Circuitry is always shorted out by dishonesty.

 

[MEntity] By "dishonesty" we mean it in a fairly clear way: that one is denying a truth by cloaking it.

 

 

On 5/26/2016 at 11:11 PM, Kasia said:

[MEntity] The Contextual Circuitries are: PROJECT, SOCIAL, INTIMACY, and MEDITATION.

 

[MEntity] These are fairly straight-forward in correlation:

 

[MEntity] When one is working on a project, the Personality will tend to lead with the GOAL. When one is in a social setting, one tends to lead with the ATTITUDE. When one is seeking or nurturing Intimacy, one tends to lead with the MODE. When one is in any state of meditation, one tends to lead with the Centering.

 

On 5/26/2016 at 11:11 PM, Kasia said:

[MEntity] In other words, when one seeks to find his "centering," or to meditate on his life, it is a return to innnocence.

 

[MEntity] Techniques and methods are helpful for the meditative state and circuitry, but this circuit is the context in every instance when you are alone.

 

[MEntity] This is why aloneness is vital for the health of any Essence or Personality.

 

[MEntity] Though aloneness is given a bad name in modern, highly-populated and dense societies, it is vital.

 

[MEntity] Every time you are alone, you are leading with Centering, and that is supported or undermined by your distractions or enthusiasms.

 

Another mind-blower, full of insights. 

[Wendy]

These really spoke to me and are very helpful.  The big question now is, how do I have more enthusiasm/resonance with Essence?  Also, not enough intimacy?  Interesting that you sent this to me today when I am pondering my profound lack of enthusiasm, which as you know is an ongoing issue for me.
 

 

[MEntity] In other words, the Emotionally-Centered can look at her Mode for how to relate to the self when alone. The Emotionally-Centered must be able to relate to herself as a means to be centered.

 

And with passion as my Mode, how do I better relate to self when alone?

 

boredom is a lack of presence and connection to Essence. If Essence is put at a distance, boredom tends to be a result. Often, when one is not enthusiastic, one shuts down the resonance to Essence.

 

[MEntity] When the Meditative circuit is weakened, it can greatly affect how the life is digested, how you see and experience yourself, and how divided or fractured you are within.
 

[MEntity] Maureen, those who are emotionally-centered, when the Meditative circuit is weakened, can tend to wait or want for external inspiration to bring them back into a strengthened circuit of meditation and centeredness.

 

!!!!!!!!!!!
 

[MEntity] They must find themselves to be inspiring again, to relate to themselves again.

 

HOW???

 

[MEntity] For those with dominant Inspiration, then the Mode is the Core Overleaf, and Intimacy tends to come easily, or is most appealing as a circuitry.

 

[MEntity] Understanding your Core Overleaf can help you to understand where most of your emphasis is on development.

 

[MEntity] It helps you to understand the state of your moods, your health, and your energy levels.

 

[MEntity] If your Core Overleaf is not fed enough, so to speak, the Personality starves, it begins to deteriorate in circuitry, which reflects in energy levels, health, and mood.

 

So I'm starving from lack of intimacy?  Too much focus on projects and not enough on relationships?

 

Edited July 20, 2017 by Wendy Rosner

[Uma]

@Wendy RosnerThese are the questions to ponder and see what comes up. What happens for me is I have questions like these, I connect to Essence and Michael and wait for an answer. It always comes, which is a delight. If I still need validation, I ask Michael in a session. But, being 'connected' to Michael and Essence is my first approach. I think when you have your session it will all get clear, especially once you have your Life Task and other Pillars. I'm really happy that this session resonated. I thought of  you when I read it. Another great thing that happens here. Synchronicity 

[Rosario]

great to revisit!!