TR Michael Speaks -- June 2009

[Janet]

MICHAEL SPEAKS - June 14, 2009 - OPEN FLOOR

 

[Michael Entity] Hello to all of you. We are here now.

 

[QUESTION] Michael. This may seem terribly "basic;" however, due to discussions amongst students, I've become confused about how the various Soul Age Levels apply to Essence's growth and development. When Essence first starts incarnating as an Infant soul, is it actually an Infant soul that then grows and develops as each level is achieved? In other words, do completing Internal Monads in positive pole, Soul Level, and Age, apply to Essence's development? Could you please clarify?

 

[Michael Entity] 
We think we understand your question and will attempt to respond appropriately.

 

What we would remind you of, first, is that what evolves is the ROLE in Essence. We realize that the terms "Essence" and "Role" are used interchangeably, and fairly so, but they are quite different in technical terms. Much like your Personality and Essence are truly "one," they are still not the same things, technically.

 

For the sake of this response, we will use the terminology of Essence for the part of you that exists with or without a Role. We will use Role to refer to the specific medium through which Essence experiences itself in relation to other fragments sharing a similar agenda, and sharing an intent to be a part of the spiritual ecology of a particular system, such as Earth, all of its life forms, and more specifically, Human Sentience.

 

The PERSONALITY experiences evolution within a single lifetime, from its Infancy to Death. Within that time frame, it goes through rites of passages relative to its physical and psychological age progression and our channels refer to those as Internal Monads. The ROLE also goes through stages that our channels refer to as Internal Monads, which is a different scale than that of the Personality. To help in clarifying this differentiation, we think it would be a good idea to refer to the Internal Monads of the Personality as "The Seven Rites of Passages" as a means to differentiate from the Seven Internal Monads of the Role. The Seven Rites of Passage are still, technically, Internal Monads, but specific to the Personality. Not all stages, or Rites of Passage during a life will be experienced or completed within a single lifetime because of physiological or psychological interruptions, limitations, and interferences.

 

ROLE experiences evolution from its first physical lifetime through its last physical incarnation, even if by proxy (Transcendental or Infinite*). Role's evolution is measured by Internal Monads, as well, but these are relative to the progression through the Soul Levels that you find in the Soul Ages. The Role's evolution through each Level is dependent on each Personality's efforts to progress through its own Rites of Passages. The further a Personality can progress through its Rites of Passages in the positive poles, the further the Role is progressed through its own Internal Monads. The 7 Internal Monads for the Role are the 7 stages of EACH LEVEL of the Soul Ages. Since it can take several Personalities (incarnations) to finally get through the 7 Life Stages, both physiologically and psychologically, it goes that it also takes that many lifetimes for a Role to progress from one level to the next in a Soul Age.

 

With this understanding, you could say that it takes 7 successful Rites of Passages to equate the 7 successful Internal Monads of the Role. The process for the 7 Rites of Passages takes place within the physiological and psychological boundaries of the Personality, whereas the 7 Internal Monads take place within the levels of Essence/Role and is built upon the processes of the Personality.

 

[ADDITIONAL ELABORATION from TROY]

 

There are a couple of ways this evolution happens:

 

COMMON PROCESS (classic process)

 

Let's use a 5th Level Old Sage who is just starting the 5th Level.

 

5th Level Personality # 1 : lives to 12 years old; finishes the 2nd Rite of Passage (positive pole)
5th Level Personality # 2 : lives to 25 years old; finishes the 3rd Rite of Passage (negative pole)
5th Level Personality # 3 : lives to 50 years old: finishes the 3rd Rite of Passage (negative pole)
5th Level Personality # 4 : lives to 52 years old; finishes 3rd Rite of Passage (positive pole)
5th Level Personality # 5 : lives to 60 years old; finishes 4th Rite of Passage (negative pole)
5th Level Personality # 6 : lives to 45 years old; finishes 4th Rite of Passage (negative pole)
5th Level Personality # 7 : lives to 55 years old; finishes 4th Rite of Passage (positive pole)
5th Level Personality # 8 : lives to 72 years old; finishes 5th Rite of Passage (negative pole)
5th Level Personality # 9 : lives to 65 years old; finishes 5th Rite of Passage (positive pole)
5th Level Personality # 10 lives to 25 years old; finishes 6th Rite of Passage (positive pole)
5th Level Personality # 11 lives to 17 years old; finishes 7th Rite of Passage (positive pole)

7 Rites of Passages Completed; 7 Internal Monads Completed = 5th LEVEL Completed

 

NEXT LIFETIME = 6th Level; and a completely new cycle through the 7 Rites of Passage/7 Internal Monads as a process toward the next soul level/age.

 

Notice that a "short" lifetime can still quickly build upon the collection of past Rites of Passage as a means to "quickly" move into the later Passages. It is often the case that if only the 6th and 7th are remaining, a child will generate a terminal illness early in the life, speeding the process of awareness of mortality and impending death as a means to sum up the Rites of Passages, Internal Monads, and Level.

 

RARE or NON-Classic Process:

 

In some lifetimes, it is of interest to the Older Soul to transit a Level WITHIN the lifetime. This is rare, but not so rare for Older Souls. When this happens, the lifetime is quite literally "two lifetimes in one." There are a multitude of reasons for choosing this process, and here's how it works:

 

Let's use a 5th Level Old Sage who decides to transit Soul Levels within a lifetime. Only the 6th and 7th Rites were not completed for the 5th Level, so rather than have a short life, or die when the 6th and 7th Rites are completed, the lifetime continues into a new cycle of Rites of Passages. When this happens, the Personality literally goes through a phase of deep awareness of its mortality and senses an impending "death."

 

All Rites of Passages are physiological and psychological. We often think of these as relative to the physical age, but that just so happens to be a classic pattern. The actual Rites can happen at any physical age. It's the psychological levels that are the important dimensions. That's why someone can be stuck in the 3rd Rite of Passage, but be 80 years old. It's also why a 12 year old can be processing the 6th Rite of Passage.

 

So when a person is transiting Soul Levels during a lifetime, it means they are also completing in the positive pole the 7th Rite of Passage. When that happens, the person undergoes a kind of psychological death (7th Rite), the Soul Level transit happens, and a psychological rebirth (1st Rite) happens, regardless of physical age. The following Rites of Passage will now add an interesting process to the lifetime as the person, regardless of physical age, now processes this rebirth, and then attempts the 2nd Rite of Mobility, the 3rd Rite of Independence, etc. as far as they can go with what years are left within the lifetime. Sometimes they only get through the first or second Rite, sometimes further.

 

[END NOTE FROM TROY]

 

[QUESTION] Does this mean that Essence can have multiple Roles incarnating -- what makes up Grand Cycles?

 

[Michael Entity]
With all of this being said, the ROLE starts as an "infant" because it is relative to its current cycle of exploration within a specific species, but the Spark who is Essence existed long before this current Role and species. There are other species and systems through which an Essence/Spark has already explored, from the initial choosing of a Role to its reunion with Tao. We refer to the entirety of this process as a Grand Cycle.

 

Your Role does not change during one of these Grand Cycles, but once that Grand Cycle is completed, the Role is discarded, along with all of its dynamics, such as Frequency and Male/Female Energy Ratios, Essence Twins, Task Companions, Entities, Cadres, etc. and when a new Grand Cycle is chosen, all of those elements are chosen anew.

 

[COMMENT] so, it's the Role that cycles off

 

[Michael Entity]
The Grand Cycle is to your Essence/Spark, what each Personality is to your Role. Most fragments within the Human Species have an average of 3 Grand Cycles. Most of our students, which is one Energy Ring, or 12 Cadres, share an average of 9 Grand Cycles.

 

Essence does not evolve without the Role and the Role does not evolve without the Personality. Personality does not evolve without the 7 Rites of Passages.

 

We realize we meandered through a response as a means to help provide context for our response. Did this answer you sufficiently for now?

 

[COMMENT] Oh, indeed! Much more than I expected . . .everything clicked into place; thank you!
[COMMENT] for me too!:)
[COMMENT] Same here
[COMMENT] wow; this is amazing good stuff - thank you

 

[Michael Entity]
In conclusion, the Essence/Spark DOES evolve, but it is on a different scale of measurement. There is a time when the Essence/Spark is an "infant," so to speak, but it inherently retains all of the qualities of Tao. The Essence/Spark's scale of evolution is of such a scale that the results would be difficult to comprehend. From what we understand, each Essence/Spark eventually runs its own universe, eventually fragmenting itself and continuing the spectacular creativity that is Tao, becoming its own "god," if you will. But this is not something one need concern oneself with as you consider how to pay your bills and get along with your loved ones.

 

The number of Grand Cycles does have some effect on the way a Role will show up, even in its first Infant lifetime. Those with higher Grand Cycles can tend to seem much wiser than those with fewer Grand Cycles, which is why Entities and Cadres who share an average of Grand Cycles tend to incarnate quite tightly at first so that no one "sticks out." As the Role evolves, the Entities and Cadres "spread out" and are more capable of blending in with other fragments who may have more or less Grand Cycles.

 

[COMMENT] Sometimes, I think we incarnate to escape the complexities of it all...we come here to stop and smell the roses so to speak

 

[Michael Entity]
We would agree, especially for those lifetimes having a Goal of Flow or Re-evaluation.

 

Next question.

 

[QUESTION] Back to basics 101 - I need a refresher on how to break the hold of the negative pole of Flow - Stagnation/Inertia. Would Michael offer some practical suggestions on dealing with this problem when it is hard just to do/start anything? I hope this is general enough - dealing with the negative pole of Flow. ( And yes, I see NCF playing a role in this as well, ) I think I'm stuck smelling the roses in only one place, hehehe

 

[Michael Entity] 
One of the most effective ways of breaking Inertia is to surrender to it. This may seem counter to the intent, but one of the things that keeps a person locked in Inertia is the sense of "running in place," or "doing a lot of nothing." When one can surrender to the gravity that seems to keep one in place, the footing can be regained, or the sense of productivity and fulfillment can be regained.

 

The point of having a Goal of Flow is to learn how to navigate within the currents that are natural to the life, and often those currents swirl, so to speak, or slow, or eddy.

 

[COMMENT] . . . or get stuck on the rocks, hehe

 

[Michael Entity] One of the greatest challenges for those in Flow is to overcome the pressure to show evidence and justification for their presence.

 

[COMMENT] and NCF gets you on that part, for sure
[COMMENT] oh boy do I get that...
[COMMENT] me too
[COMMENT] same here
[COMMENT] It certainly affected me and I'm not in Flow
[COMMENT] definitely me too

 

[Michael Entity] When a fragment chooses Flow as a Goal, it is because there is an interest in the nuances and subtleties of existence and this increases the sensitivity of the Personality.

 

[COMMENT] a big Ah
[COMMENT] I second that!
[COMMENT] So, smell that rose until it blackens, shrivels, and dries
[COMMENT] .... and then make potpourri!
[COMMENT] hehehe
[COMMENT] yes!
[COMMENT] lol

 

[Michael Entity] This sensitivity is heightened so as to develop an intuitive grasp of the life and its natural flow, much like one might have when navigating a boat, skateboard, or other vehicle of momentum that pulls all of the senses together to calculate navigation without having to over analyze.

 

[COMMENT] I understand this completely
[COMMENT] hmm, maybe why this is why I think well while driving, lol; driving alone that is
[COMMENT] I absolutely understand the idea of subtle navigation

 

[Michael Entity] However, this sensitivity then leads to an awareness of all of the subtleties of one's "insides," so to speak, so all of the areas within oneself that are not flowing freely are felt, too.

 

[COMMENT] perhaps that is part of the problem - a feeling that the natural flow is being blocked and feeling uncomfortable with that and wanting to 'flow' again - and not quite seeing how to get back there.

 

[Michael Entity] Often, the Personality will turn to external environments for the solution to the lack of freedom within.

 

[COMMENT] hence the inertia...

 

[Michael Entity] Flowing externally and can help the flow, internally, but often it can take internal adjustments, as well.

 

[COMMENT] ok
[COMMENT] empty the well - so; it can be refilled

 

[Michael Entity] Both the internal and external are connected, and one can help the other, but when one is neglected over the other, it can cause the sense of inertia, no matter how productive and free the life can seem in one area over the other.

 

One of the most effective ways we've seen our students understand the concept of FLOW is to set alongside it the concept of PERMISSION.

 

[COMMENT] ah to allow the flow......

 

[Michael Entity] When one feels the life is not flowing, internally or externally, it can help to ask where one has limited his or her sense of Permission. And often that permission is the barrier to the very simple and freeing experience of Relaxation. To relax. To embrace. To allow. To Be. Without apology or proof.

 

[COMMENT] oh geeze, yes
[COMMENT] thank you!

 

[Michael Entity]
We have more to say about this, especially in terms of how the negative pole can be shifted by using the positive pole of the other Goals, but we will elaborate on that in other sessions.

 

Next Question

 

[COMMENT] thank you very much, Michael
[COMMENT] that was excellent; thank you
[COMMENT] it was very freeing for me
[COMMENT] quite excellent!
[COMMENT] it
[COMMENT] Today is a joy!

 

[QUESTION] Hello Michael, my question has to do with choosing overleaves. In reviewing [between lives] does the fragment look over the whole series of incarnations to decide, or find a particular lifetime where something got missed... could you give me an example of how I chose this life's overleaves?

 

[Michael Entity]
There are basically three ways a fragment will choose its Overleaves: Randomly, Out of Curiosity, and Through Calculation.

 

Earliest Personalities of the Infant Soul are a product of Randomness, with "random" simply meaning that no intent or calculation was involved in the choice, though choice was still involved.

 

Late Baby through Early Mature bring Personalities that are products of Curiosity, meaning that there is more involved in the choice of Overleaves, but often with an "I wonder what would happen if..." kind of perspective.

 

Mid Mature through Late Old can bring the most calculated Personalities, as the intent for final comprehension, integration, and commitment to the path for that fragment ensues.

 

7th Level Old is a free-for-all, which is why many who are truly 7th Level Old do not appear to be Old at all, since the Personalities are not of those you would presume to be so wise. But that is a perk of "getting older," in that one is no longer constrained by fears, obligations, ties, etc. and one can finally play with lifetimes in a way that are thoroughly understood as safe.

 

[COMMENT] the perks of Old Age.....:)

 

[Michael Entity] Some of the oldest souls on your planet are simply annoying and bring nothing of obvious value to society or to their social circles. Some of the "wisest," most spiritual and grounded of souls on your planet are far younger in soul age than one might presume, but many of these guru-like fragments are caught in the maya of what "wise" should look like, and play the role quite well.

 

[COMMENT] I have always felt I planned all this since I was a kid

 

[Michael Entity]
The mapping of a lifetime, and the adherence to that map, vary from fragment to fragment, Personality to Personality.

 

It would be accurate to say that you are of the more calculated choice in Overleaves and that your Personality found the mapping of your life to be of value, and adheres to that map within reason.

 

Next question

 

[QUESTION] abandonment - we all do this a lot , we come together, we go apart , that is life, as we know it... so, what can you tell me, that would help all of us, with this type of issue involved with our passages through our lives -- i am sure, it is a theme for many -- how deeply rooted is ABANDONMENT/does it have 7 levels; and; how do each of the 7 chief dragons affect it, like impatience, arrogance, self dep; self destruction, etc

 

[Michael Entity] True Abandonment is of such popularity for exploration by souls that it is within the 30 "Classic" (external) Monads: the Abandoned and the Abandoner. It is quite popular for the same reasons that the other relationships are popular: it is an accelerated experience that holds great potential for learning about oneself. True Abandonment is an experience that eventually leads to a discovery of self-value and empowerment that, when discovered, is unprecedented. True Abandonment is antithesis to the truth of your resonance with others, and to experience it pushes one to question the value of oneself in ways that few other experiences push one to question in that way. The process of being abandoned, and the process of questioning, can be extremely painful until the lies are worked through and the truth is finally comprehended: that the value of self is never dependent upon the relative position one is within a relationship; and that the experience of abandonment is, ironically, due to the overblown value one has placed upon another fragment over self.

 

[COMMENT] BINGO!
[COMMENT] wow
[COMMENT] (no wonder why sometimes, it is so easy to just detach)
[COMMENT] what will the wind blow in next LOL sort of the like the ocean tide that deposits its treasures
[COMMENT] I learned a lot of that in this go-round with my Father was a double-edged sword understanding intellectually why but an emotional hile

 

[Michael Entity]
There are 7 Circles of Abandonment that one can initiate or experience:

 

• Survival Abandonment: which is the abandonment of a position that is necessary for the survival of another, such as a mother abandoning a baby in a ditch.
• Sexual Abandonment: which is the abandonment of a position that nurtures another in an intimate way, either literally sexually, or simply as embracing the Other as Oneself.
• Physical Abandonment: which is the abandonment of a position that was necessary for the mobility and productivity of another fragment.
• Emotional Abandonment: which is the abandonment of a position that embraces another fragment with room to Be without explanation or apology.
• Intellectual Abandonment: which is the abandonment of a position of communication and exchange with another.
• Intuitive Abandonment: which is the abandonment of a position of encouragement for upholding the fulfillment of visions, dreams, and wishes.
• Spiritual Abandonment: which is the abandonment of a position of guidance and clarity for the bigger picture and pattern of the life.

 

[COMMENT] wow-this is very deep stuff--you are writing a book of great value troy/michael-as, you do this
[COMMENT] that alone gives me mucho food for ponderings

 

[Michael Entity]
In instances of True Abandonment, Karma is often created. When we say True Abandonment, we mean that one has instilled oneself as a provider for a particular context, and then bails on the responsibilities of that position upon which another became dependent. When one experiences True Abandonment, the effects are valid and we do not mean to suggest that they are not, though we do suggest that most of the contexts can be overcome as the individual fragment finds his or her own sense of value.

 

In the first context of Survival, the exploration of value is dependent upon Essence, not the Personality. The Essence will either let the life go as a means to start again in another life, or find a way to get help to the Personality that has been abandoned, if the Personality is receptive to that help.

 

[COMMENT] And all the 7 seems to relate somehow with the 7 chakras and centers too

 

[Michael Entity] Yes, there is a relevant parallel to the Chakras.

 

[COMMENT] (you can NOT make someone else into something of value-they must learn to do that for themselves-otherwise, they do NOT appreciate it , as, they would, if they earned the rite of passage for themselves)

 

[QUESTION] Every Personality can experience many abandonments which are only experience -- not Monadal levels of True Abandonment?

 

[Michael Entity]
The Monadal process of Abandoned/Abandoner would focus on a single Circle, or context, emphasizing, for instance, Sexual Abandonment or Intuitive Abandonment. The Monad of Abandoned/Abandoner can be played out multiple times across different relationships for emphasis on the different Circles, or contexts.

 

We would also wish to clarify that we use the term True Abandonment to refer to the legitimate relinquishing of responsibilities for a position that was originally, mutually agreed upon. This is to differentiate from the INTERPRETATION of Abandonment that is merely a reaction to the disappointment that someone did not fulfill your expectations.

 

Most instances of True Abandonment are thoroughly explored by mid to late Mature. Most instances of abandonment after that are those of interpretation and directly related to self-karmic issues (personal, internal divisions within) that one is working on resolving.

 

Last question.

 

[QUESTION] An Infant soul has certain characteristics. Are these Infant Soul characteristics similar to what is experienced at each level. So that a person at a level one Old soul age, will be orienting to this new Age with some of the perspective of an Infant but specifically to the Old Soul experience.

 

[Michael Entity]
That is a valid observation. It could be said that the First Level of any Soul Age is the "infant" level of that soul age, and so on. The 6th and 7th Levels of a Soul Age would resonate to the Transcendental and Infinite Soul Ages, wherein the 6th Level is a process of opening to the collective experiences of your Essence for guidance through the life, and the 7th Level is a process of openness to one's Entity for guidance for the life. While this is not a strict correlation, it is one that can help lend understanding to each Level.

 

We will conclude here. Good day to each of you. Goodbye.

[Uma]

On 5/18/2016 at 5:25 PM, Janet said:

[Michael Entity]
In conclusion, the Essence/Spark DOES evolve, but it is on a different scale of measurement. There is a time when the Essence/Spark is an "infant," so to speak, but it inherently retains all of the qualities of Tao. The Essence/Spark's scale of evolution is of such a scale that the results would be difficult to comprehend. From what we understand, each Essence/Spark eventually runs its own universe, eventually fragmenting itself and continuing the spectacular creativity that is Tao, becoming its own "god," if you will. But this is not something one need concern oneself with as you consider how to pay your bills and get along with your loved ones.

 

maybe not, but it sure is an incredible thought.

[Ingun]

On 5/18/2016 at 11:25 PM, Janet said:

One of the most effective ways we've seen our students understand the concept of FLOW is to set alongside it the concept of PERMISSION.

 

[Michael Entity] When one feels the life is not flowing, internally or externally, it can help to ask where one has limited his or her sense of Permission. And often that permission is the barrier to the very simple and freeing experience of Relaxation. To relax. To embrace. To allow. To Be. Without apology or proof.

 

This! for those with Goal of FLOW. I see this so clearly in my son, and I wish for him to expand his sense of Permission and the rest would follow. ?

Edited October 1, 2017 by Ingun

[Uma]

@Janet H and @Wendy Nancy would also benefit from this FLOW info when you see her. I think this is great info.

[Wendy]

On 5/18/2016 at 5:25 PM, Janet said:

[Michael Entity] One of the greatest challenges for those in Flow is to overcome the pressure to show evidence and justification for their presence.

OMG I know this one so well!

[Janet]

Bumping this session: I came across it this morning, and it is quite full of treasures. Role vs. Essence vs. Spark, Grand Cycles, Internal Monads vs. Rites of Passage, Goal of Flow info, Circles of Abandonment. Something for everyone. 

[petra]

I wonder about this statement, and maybe it was already addressed later, but if not I would like a clarification:

 

MICHAEL SPEAKS - June 14, 2009 - OPEN FLOOR

 

[Michael Entity]
With all of this being said, the ROLE starts as an "infant" because it is relative to its current cycle of exploration within a specific species, but the Spark who is Essence existed long before this current Role and species. There are other species and systems through which an Essence/Spark has already explored, from the initial choosing of a Role to its reunion with Tao. We refer to the entirety of this process as a Grand Cycle.

 

Your Role does not change during one of these Grand Cycles, but once that Grand Cycle is completed, the Role is discarded, along with all of its dynamics, such as Frequency and Male/Female Energy Ratios, Essence Twins, Task Companions, Entities, Cadres, etc. and when a new Grand Cycle is chosen, all of those elements are chosen anew.

 

the Role is discarded, along with all of its dynamics, such as Frequency and Male/Female Energy Ratios ????????

 

@Troy  Anyone who can clarify !!!  Thanks

[Maureen]

2 minutes ago, petra said:

I wonder about this statement, and maybe it was already addressed later, but if not I would like a clarification:

 

MICHAEL SPEAKS - June 14, 2009 - OPEN FLOOR

 

[Michael Entity]
With all of this being said, the ROLE starts as an "infant" because it is relative to its current cycle of exploration within a specific species, but the Spark who is Essence existed long before this current Role and species. There are other species and systems through which an Essence/Spark has already explored, from the initial choosing of a Role to its reunion with Tao. We refer to the entirety of this process as a Grand Cycle.

 

Your Role does not change during one of these Grand Cycles, but once that Grand Cycle is completed, the Role is discarded, along with all of its dynamics, such as Frequency and Male/Female Energy Ratios, Essence Twins, Task Companions, Entities, Cadres, etc. and when a new Grand Cycle is chosen, all of those elements are chosen anew.

 

the Role is discarded, along with all of its dynamics, such as Frequency and Male/Female Energy Ratios ????????

 

@Troy  Anyone who can clarify !!!  Thanks

 

@petra, interestingly I just read this yesterday. This may not be enough but it's something. ♥

 

Reply by TROY on December 15, 2009 at 1:33am

 

Geraldine B said:

 

No. The actual phrase that is repeatedly used is "your role in essence." The role in essence exists before casting and after cycling off. Casting is your placement within the Entity. Once the entity fully reunites because all of its essences have cycled off, the casting ceases to matter. Essence is more than the role, and doesn't go through soul level development as such -- it's the role in essence that does. But, while role matters less as evolution continues upwards, Michael continues to speak of being composed of Warriors and Kings -- never mentions what casting they held.

Whoosh! I can't wait to get my library up and running to help keep these confusing matters down.

Michael calls it "Role in Essence" because our Essence chooses a Role. Even though Essence and Role are interchangeable for convenience, Michael does differentiate for the point that "we" exist beyond the Role we play in a cycle of incarnations. Our Essence continues beyond our return to Tao, even after we've stripped all Role, Casting, Entity, etc. That's us at the deepest core of who we are.

Casting is actually a long string of numbers and is our "address" within the structure of our Entity, Cadre, Energy Ring, etc. The most relevant part of that address to us is our position within our Cadence, and our Role (which is part of Casting, itself).

Michael says that beyond the Causal Plane, our Role ceases to be of any significance individually, but that our Casting becomes the most significant. That's because Casting (in that sense) INCLUDES our Role.

Our Role is most relevant while we are fragmented, but once we are reunited in the Entity, our address within that structure is most relevant. That's also because once we are reunited, we're among a multitude of the same Role, so our Casting POSITION becomes more relevant than our Role.

Michael describes themselves in terms of Roles because that's something unique to an Entity, and relevant to us while we are here. An Entity might be made up of 1050 Scholars/Artisans, but the Casting is a repetition of 1 through 7, over and over and over again in a mathematical, beat-like system (cadences), so it makes sense to go with the overall flavor.

I hope that helps!

troy

[petra]

@Maureen  what bugs me is that Frequency and Energy Ratio are being discarded after the completion of a Grand Cycle, as it is said above???

[Christian]

Ah. So casting is out IP address.

[Jeroen]

1 hour ago, petra said:

@Maureen  what bugs me is that Frequency and Energy Ratio are being discarded after the completion of a Grand Cycle, as it is said above???

 

That caught my eye too as I read the session.

 

The below session is where a specific question was asked on the Frequency of Essence. Per the session below, it would appear that the Frequency is locked across all Grand Cycles within the context of this Universe.

 

https://our.truthloveenergy.com/articles.html/library/essence-dynamics/energies-of-essence/frequency/frequency-locked-across-all-grand-cycles-r950/

 

Quote: "MEntity:
In response to your first question: Yes, Frequency and Focused/Creative Energy are locked across all Grand Cycles within a universe.

 

These are the very unique "signatures" that identify a fragment with or without a Role. Once that signature is claimed, that fragment is capable of being recognized and identified, even upon return to the most conclusive oneness that is Tao.

 

The Roles, however, also carry their own frequency, but that is only in terms of inherent characteristics that are then overridden by any individual Essence. So there is validity to the fact of more solid Roles, and less solid Roles, and that solid or less solid effect is a generality in each lifetime. However, the more one Manifests Essence, the more one's own Frequency begins to override any solidity or liquidity.

 

In earlier Grand Cycles, the Frequency of the Essences will tend to gravitate toward the range that is inherent in the Roles, but as one's number of Grand Cycles rise, the differences between the Frequency and the inherent range of the Role can be quite drastic.

 

Those who are in False Personality will tend to be experienced and be navigating based on the default of the Role.

 

Those who are in True Personality will tend to be experienced and be navigating based on the Frequency of Essence.

 

Between lives, and in terms of Review, the default of the Role will tend to be the case in the earlier lifetimes, and then, eventually, the Essence's own Frequency is owned and used.

 

The above is meant in the context of how one processes experiences. However one processes experiences, the Frequency will still be static."

 

One of the things that has not been explored as well is what happens to each Essence when this Universe eventually collapses if that is what happens and a new Universe is born. Michael once referred to this process as an inversion shifting the emphasis of a Universe from one theme to another. Does the frequency of all Essences change then?

[petra]

@Jeroen  Thank You very much for clarification, all I knew was (joining TLE mid 2017) that Frequency and E-Ratio will not change. Being a student of a living Teaching, I am glad that this is now all recorded in our comments!!!

 

@Maureen  Thank You !!!

[Delphi]

13 hours ago, petra said:

@Jeroen  Thank You very much for clarification, all I knew was (joining TLE mid 2017) that Frequency and E-Ratio will not change. Being a student of a living Teaching, I am glad that this is now all recorded in our comments!!!

 

@Maureen  Thank You !!!

The unchanging nature of frequency and E-ratio makes me think whether this ‘address’ is truly like our cadre and entity across grand cycles, being as they are the address of the spark beyond the essence.

In that case, would essence twins be some of our closest neighbours in this spark landscape, as they have energy ratios exactly opposite of ours, and frequency that is basically exactly complimentary to ours? Then, what about those that share our frequency number, are they close neighbours on a spark level too?

 

And in terms of grand cycles being like soul ages for the spark, I wonder whether those that have higher grand cycle counts spend more time in their positive poles in their earlier lives, or quickly develop more sustainable solutions even in infant lives like our Caretakers, infant only in the sense of familiarising themselves with the bodies of a new species and environments rather than in enlightenment. This would seem to blur conventional ideas about younger and older souls then, as it is perhaps possible that a younger soul with a higher grand cycle count might actually ‘remember’ more than an older soul that is less experienced on a grand cycle level.

[Janet]

49 minutes ago, Delphi said:

The unchanging nature of frequency and E-ratio makes me think whether this ‘address’ is truly like our cadre and entity across grand cycles, being as they are the address of the spark beyond the essence. In that case, would essence twins be some of our closest neighbours in this spark landscape, as they have energy ratios exactly opposite of ours, and frequency that is basically exactly complimentary to ours?

Cadres and Entities are formed for a specific Grand Cycle, and not across Grand Cycles. Thus, Essence Twins can change from Grand Cycle to Grand Cycle. Michael refers to Essence Twins from earlier Grand Cycles as Essence Mates. I doubt there is any need for a grouping such as Cadre and Entity when merged with Tao, since all fragments would be one (while still retaining individuality).

 

If you're in the Fringe & Whackadoodle Club, you might want to look at this transcript: Frequencies, Essence Twins, Fire, Essences. For those not interested in that Club, I'll add the relevant content here, since it's not really Fringe.

 

Geraldine_B:

Often times we see the Frequencies and M/F Energies of ETs being polar opposites. Yet, Spark doesn't keep the same ET through all of the Grand Cycles.

 

And, we've been told that Spark keeps the same Energy Signature permanently, not just for a Grand Cycle.

 

Could you clarify the seeming discrepancy between ETs and permanent energy signatures?

 

MEntity:

Any fragments of any Frequency can be Essence Twins, but the balance of Energy Ratios tends to be exact or close to exact in opposite ratios at about 95% of the time. This is not always the case, but most often the case. There are fragments with no Essence Twin who will have "surrogate" Essence Twins, as well, with ratios that are not quite exact in balance. So, there are some combinations where the fragments who choose to be Essence Twins will not be balanced in Energy Ratio, but as with nearly everything in the universe that follows the nature of awesome order, there are always anomalies for the sake of creative exploration and new experiences not built from familiarity.

 

First, we should clarify that the Frequency and Energy Ratio are short-hand. The actual Frequency of an individual fragment would be a lengthy fraction to accommodate its uniqueness. The same is true of the Energy Ratio. So a 45/55 or a 75/25 is actually a 45.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx..../55.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx... number. So no Fragment's ratio or frequency will ever be the same as another. ...

 

Next, each fragment ever to be a fragment has a unique combination of the Frequency and Energy Ratio. ...

 

If this universe has, say, a total of 144 Designs, numbering around 2 trillion fragments, then the count of fragments from which to choose who have an Energy Ratio that is relatively complementary to your own is still a massive count of fragments, even if one were to stick within 1 point either way.

 

Add to that the 5% of the time when the range is not limited to within 1 point, this allows for the rearrangement of fragments across Designs very easily.

 

###

 

It occurs to me that the Spark mostly closely aligned with my own in terms of Frequency and E-Ratio might not even be human. 

 

52 minutes ago, Delphi said:

And in terms of grand cycles being like soul ages for the spark, I wonder whether those that have higher grand cycle counts spend more time in their positive poles in their earlier lives

See Michael Speaks: July 2009:

 

[QUESTION] I have a question about the influence of past cycles. It there are two fragments, A and B. Fragment A has completed 15 cycles as a human being. Fragment B has no previous cycles. If both are beginning a new grand cycle, how would the perspective of A be different from B in the Infant stage? Generally how would the experience of the entire new cycle be different?

 

[Michael Entity] We can only speak from observation of similar phenomenon, and what we have observed is that "fragment A" would manifest Essence and propel through the levels of Soul Age at a rate that could be described as "faster" than that of "fragment B." In most cases of a Sentient Race, the gaps in Grand Cycle experience are bridged by fewer incarnations from those who have more Grand Cycles. In other words, "Fragment A" may have 1 lifetime for every 10 of "fragment B." This is why the lifetime count for many of our students is lower than those who are of a much Younger Soul Age, because the average Grand Cycle count for your species is 3, whereas many of our students average around 9.

 

17 hours ago, petra said:

what bugs me is that Frequency and Energy Ratio are being discarded after the completion of a Grand Cycle, as it is said above???

This is why Michael asks us to validate. Even Troy gets it wrong now and then. Hopefully the content I've quoted helps confirm that Frequency and E-Ratio are unchanging within the universe (assuming that the majority of sessions in which Michael speaks of this are correct, and not this single session). Of course, when this universe ends, all bets are off. 

 

MEntity: Yes, in the simplest terms we can convey, the forming of Energy Rings is based on the breakdown of themes into 12 Cadres, and then the merging of the Energy Ring is the merging of those themes. It is more complex than that, but it is a fair enough way to describe it. This is also true on the scale of universes stacked in groups of 12 that collapse and expand into one another to rotate out themes. [From The Number 12] ###

 

15 hours ago, Jeroen said:

One of the things that has not been explored as well is what happens to each Essence when this Universe eventually collapses if that is what happens and a new Universe is born. Michael once referred to this process as an inversion shifting the emphasis of a Universe from one theme to another. Does the frequency of all Essences change then?

My guess is that not even Michael can predict what happens with Sparks when the universe collapses and expands. But it would be interesting to ask.

[Delphi]

4 hours ago, Janet said:

Cadres and Entities are formed for a specific Grand Cycle, and not across Grand Cycles. Thus, Essence Twins can change from Grand Cycle to Grand Cycle. Michael refers to Essence Twins from earlier Grand Cycles as Essence Mates. I doubt there is any need for a grouping such as Cadre and Entity when merged with Tao, since all fragments would be one (while still retaining individuality).

 

If you're in the Fringe & Whackadoodle Club, you might want to look at this transcript: Frequencies, Essence Twins, Fire, Essences. For those not interested in that Club, I'll add the relevant content here, since it's not really Fringe.

 

Geraldine_B:

Often times we see the Frequencies and M/F Energies of ETs being polar opposites. Yet, Spark doesn't keep the same ET through all of the Grand Cycles.

 

And, we've been told that Spark keeps the same Energy Signature permanently, not just for a Grand Cycle.

 

Could you clarify the seeming discrepancy between ETs and permanent energy signatures?

 

MEntity:

Any fragments of any Frequency can be Essence Twins, but the balance of Energy Ratios tends to be exact or close to exact in opposite ratios at about 95% of the time. This is not always the case, but most often the case. There are fragments with no Essence Twin who will have "surrogate" Essence Twins, as well, with ratios that are not quite exact in balance. So, there are some combinations where the fragments who choose to be Essence Twins will not be balanced in Energy Ratio, but as with nearly everything in the universe that follows the nature of awesome order, there are always anomalies for the sake of creative exploration and new experiences not built from familiarity.

 

First, we should clarify that the Frequency and Energy Ratio are short-hand. The actual Frequency of an individual fragment would be a lengthy fraction to accommodate its uniqueness. The same is true of the Energy Ratio. So a 45/55 or a 75/25 is actually a 45.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx..../55.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx... number. So no Fragment's ratio or frequency will ever be the same as another. ...

 

Next, each fragment ever to be a fragment has a unique combination of the Frequency and Energy Ratio. ...

 

If this universe has, say, a total of 144 Designs, numbering around 2 trillion fragments, then the count of fragments from which to choose who have an Energy Ratio that is relatively complementary to your own is still a massive count of fragments, even if one were to stick within 1 point either way.

 

Add to that the 5% of the time when the range is not limited to within 1 point, this allows for the rearrangement of fragments across Designs very easily.

 

###

 

It occurs to me that the Spark mostly closely aligned with my own in terms of Frequency and E-Ratio might not even be human. ">

 

See Michael Speaks: July 2009:

 

[QUESTION] I have a question about the influence of past cycles. It there are two fragments, A and B. Fragment A has completed 15 cycles as a human being. Fragment B has no previous cycles. If both are beginning a new grand cycle, how would the perspective of A be different from B in the Infant stage? Generally how would the experience of the entire new cycle be different?

 

[Michael Entity] We can only speak from observation of similar phenomenon, and what we have observed is that "fragment A" would manifest Essence and propel through the levels of Soul Age at a rate that could be described as "faster" than that of "fragment B." In most cases of a Sentient Race, the gaps in Grand Cycle experience are bridged by fewer incarnations from those who have more Grand Cycles. In other words, "Fragment A" may have 1 lifetime for every 10 of "fragment B." This is why the lifetime count for many of our students is lower than those who are of a much Younger Soul Age, because the average Grand Cycle count for your species is 3, whereas many of our students average around 9.

 

This is why Michael asks us to validate. Even Troy gets it wrong now and then. Hopefully the content I've quoted helps confirm that Frequency and E-Ratio are unchanging within the universe (assuming that the majority of sessions in which Michael speaks of this are correct, and not this single session). Of course, when this universe ends, all bets are off. ">

 

MEntity: Yes, in the simplest terms we can convey, the forming of Energy Rings is based on the breakdown of themes into 12 Cadres, and then the merging of the Energy Ring is the merging of those themes. It is more complex than that, but it is a fair enough way to describe it. This is also true on the scale of universes stacked in groups of 12 that collapse and expand into one another to rotate out themes. [From The Number 12] ###

 

My guess is that not even Michael can predict what happens with Sparks when the universe collapses and expands. But it would be interesting to ask.

I typed up a response and it seems to have disappeared. Anyway I’ll summarize what I said. 12 is a special number as the number with the greatest density of factors for its size, and according to esoteric numerological interpretations is the fulfillment of heaven on earth, the product of spirit (3) and matter (4). But I would like to hear from Michael why 12 is this trigger point for coalescence.

 

I may have worded my point about sparks poorly, I understood cadres and so on disappear with each grand cycle but was more referring to the idea of those with similar frequencies being our permanent neighbors. And yes maybe that fragment isn’t human but there may be deep mysterious interactions with that fragment that we are still unaware of! Something to ask Michael.

 

I was not aware that ETs did not need to have the same frequency or even E ratios within a point of one another, that makes me rethink some assumptions I had. Thanks for linking that information. That makes the choice of ET even more mysterious as there are so many with complementary E ratios, if we interpret that as the direction our energy acts they almost seem like an exalted task companion. If ETs are chosen amongst those with almost complementary E ratios, then what do we make of those with almost our exact frequencies, or ‘natures’ in a sense? Is there a special bond between those fragments?

 

Acceleration between lives makes sense as a way to balance out ‘younger’ souls with a higher GC count and those with a lower GC count but higher soul age. I certainly see this in some members on TLE lol.

[petra]

@Delphi  In my Essence Twin Session  Michael shared with me the following, the bold part is what we didn't know before:

 

Placement in the Cadres and Entities comes after choosing an Essence Twin, because of the 6 Traveling Companions, coordination and choice are the other factors involved, aside from that Essence Twins will always share the exact Casting Position.

Raw Numbers and Positions can be different. It is the Casting Position that matter in the link. For instance, Warrior-cast and Warrior-cast.

Because of the differences in sizes of Entities, your technical numbers may be different, but where you land relative to the size of your Entity is where the link is.

Essence Twins are NEVER in the same Entity, 6 out 0f 7 times the casting is the same.

 

Your idea of exalted task companion, doesn't make sense to me cause they are mostly from our own Entity, but what about Traveling Companions:

 

 

Traveling Companions feel so like Essence Twins because they are nearly the same, except for one major difference. See below.

 

Essence Twins

Your Essence Twin is always one of the Traveling Companions

 

5% of all fragments don’t even have a Twin because of this (but they will always have their Traveling Companions).

 

It was originally channeled that 6 out of 7 times Essence Twins are the same Role, but this was before we understood Casting. An updated theory is that 6 out of 7 times, Essence Twins are the same Casting Position. The reason there would be that 7th time that Casting was not shared, is because of the flexibility needed to accommodate the varying structures and populations of Entities, and of course, to accommodate the need for variation in the first place.

 

Essence Twins are NEVER from the same Entity.

 

Traveling Companions “feel” very much like Essence Twins, so when your Essence Twin is not available within a life, often one of your Traveling Companions is.

 

Traveling Companions feel like Essence Twins because an Essence Twin IS a Traveling Companion, and every Traveling Companion shares a mathematical link with each other. Every Essence Twin is a Traveling Companion, but not all Traveling Companions are Essence Twins.

 

MEntity:  Traveling Companions are bonded by a mathematical resonance

 

that these fragments "travel" with you mathematically in terms of how the Cadre is designed. 

 

So here you have my little cocktail, much LOVE!!!

[Delphi]

26 minutes ago, petra said:

@Delphi  In my Essence Twin Session  Michael shared with me the following, the bold part is what we didn't know before:

 

Placement in the Cadres and Entities comes after choosing an Essence Twin, because of the 6 Traveling Companions, coordination and choice are the other factors involved, aside from that Essence Twins will always share the exact Casting Position.

Raw Numbers and Positions can be different. It is the Casting Position that matter in the link. For instance, Warrior-cast and Warrior-cast.

Because of the differences in sizes of Entities, your technical numbers may be different, but where you land relative to the size of your Entity is where the link is.

Essence Twins are NEVER in the same Entity, 6 out 0f 7 times the casting is the same.

 

Your idea of exalted task companion, doesn't make sense to me cause they are mostly from our own Entity, but what about Traveling Companions:

 

 

Traveling Companions feel so like Essence Twins because they are nearly the same, except for one major difference. See below.

 

Essence Twins

Your Essence Twin is always one of the Traveling Companions

 

5% of all fragments don’t even have a Twin because of this (but they will always have their Traveling Companions).

 

It was originally channeled that 6 out of 7 times Essence Twins are the same Role, but this was before we understood Casting. An updated theory is that 6 out of 7 times, Essence Twins are the same Casting Position. The reason there would be that 7th time that Casting was not shared, is because of the flexibility needed to accommodate the varying structures and populations of Entities, and of course, to accommodate the need for variation in the first place.

 

Essence Twins are NEVER from the same Entity.

 

Traveling Companions “feel” very much like Essence Twins, so when your Essence Twin is not available within a life, often one of your Traveling Companions is.

 

Traveling Companions feel like Essence Twins because an Essence Twin IS a Traveling Companion, and every Traveling Companion shares a mathematical link with each other. Every Essence Twin is a Traveling Companion, but not all Traveling Companions are Essence Twins.

 

MEntity:  Traveling Companions are bonded by a mathematical resonance

 

that these fragments "travel" with you mathematically in terms of how the Cadre is designed. 

 

So here you have my little cocktail, much LOVE!!!

Thank you for sharing @petra. I knew about the concept of task companions but maybe I was sloppy in my wording, I meant to convey the idea that we choose an ET because we are interested in a shared theme across the whole grand cycle. But I did not know that we chose our ET before our cadres and entities, it does kind of make sense though as we would probably coordinate the kind of experience and effect we would want to have, hence similar  relative places in the entity. I wonder if we then choose our travelling companions after our ET? If there are six travelling companions then, and ETs are always one of them, are those six always travelling companions for each other? Because in 7 fragments there will only be 3 pairs, maybe that is the fragment without the ET or with a twin with a different casting (the other odd one out in another set of travelling companions). Or does it all happen simultaneously?

[petra]

@Delphi  We are talking about Cosmic Bonds, to bring in a time factor? from our perspective this may have happened 20 million years ago?

 

Seems like to me after we choose through casting and coordination our Essence Twin, mathematically our Traveling Companions fell into place as well, whilst committing to a Cadre/Entity.

In the committed Grand Cycle our Essence Twin and our 5 Traveling Companions will not change, till the GC is over, as I understand it right now.

 

Why 3 pairs? It is you an Essence Twin and 5 Traveling Companions, the seventh is needed to make the connection to the next, and the next Cadre etc.

 

I like to follow your mind, somehow we will figure this out or ask Michael.

 

[Delphi]

5 hours ago, petra said:

@Delphi  We are talking about Cosmic Bonds, to bring in a time factor? from our perspective this may have happened 20 million years ago?

 

Seems like to me after we choose through casting and coordination our Essence Twin, mathematically our Traveling Companions fell into place as well, whilst committing to a Cadre/Entity.

In the committed Grand Cycle our Essence Twin and our 5 Traveling Companions will not change, till the GC is over, as I understand it right now.

 

Why 3 pairs? It is you an Essence Twin and 5 Traveling Companions, the seventh is needed to make the connection to the next, and the next Cadre etc.

 

I like to follow your mind, somehow we will figure this out or ask Michael.

 

Yes Cosmic bonds. Haha that sounds right to me, must have been the moment we chose a casting and committed to a cadre others in the same position as us kind of lit up on a screen and became our travelling companions. Makes total sense the seventh connects to the next cadre seems like we both came to that conclusion.

Now the mystery is, what goes into the choice of ET for the first time out of the mindbending number of possibilities. And whether the ET comes first, or choice of design? But I have a feeling the ET comes first.

[petra]

@Delphi  You are way to linear for me on this one!

[Maureen]

On 5/18/2016 at 5:25 PM, Janet said:

In conclusion, the Essence/Spark DOES evolve, but it is on a different scale of measurement. There is a time when the Essence/Spark is an "infant," so to speak, but it inherently retains all of the qualities of Tao. The Essence/Spark's scale of evolution is of such a scale that the results would be difficult to comprehend. From what we understand, each Essence/Spark eventually runs its own universe, eventually fragmenting itself and continuing the spectacular creativity that is Tao, becoming its own "god," if you will. But this is not something one need concern oneself with as you consider how to pay your bills and get along with your loved ones.

 

Happy New Year!!!  This quote from Michael reminded me of something I read today from Seth:

 

WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF EXISTENCE?  WHY WAS I BORN?

 

Seth - "The human race is a stage though which various forms of consciousness travel.

 

Before you can be allowed into systems of reality that are more extensive and open, you must first learn to handle energy; and see, through physical materialization, the concrete result of thought and emotion.”

 

"In more advanced systems, thoughts and emotions are automatically and immediately translated into action... Therefore, the lessons must be taught and learned well. The responsibility for creation must be clearly understood“… you must be taught and trained to create responsibly. Yours is a training system for emerging consciousness.”

 

“You are learning to be cocreators. You are learning to be gods as you now understand the term. You are learning responsibility- the responsibility of any individualized consciousness. You are learning to handle the energy that is yourself, for creative purposes.”

 

From “The Early Sessions:”

 

“The child must mature, and your system is a maturing ground, a very primary one…. A beginning school…”

 

“The human race is a stage though which various forms of consciousness travel. Before you can be allowed into systems of reality that are more extensive and open, you must first learn to handle energy and see, through physical materialization, the concrete result of thought and emotion.”

 

“In more advanced systems, thoughts, and emotions are automatically and immediately translated into action, into whatever approximation of matter there exists. Therefore, the lessons must be taught and learned well. The responsibility for creation must be clearly understood.”

 

According to Seth, the physical world can be thought of as an elementary school. We are all enrolled in a cosmic grade school and we are here to learn AND to enjoy our being. In the fertile soil of physical reality we are meant to grow and blossom.

 

Our day to day experience is our classroom, and we are learning the A.B.C.'s of how to use energy so that we can become conscious co-creators with the Universal Spirit, Mind, God, All THAT IS, or whatever term you prefer. On the one hand we are each unique manifestations of the Universal Spirit/All That Is, and on the other hand we are individual “infant” gods, or gods in training.

 

One of the most important lessons to be learned is that we create our own reality, according to our thoughts, emotions and beliefs. We each have access to unlimited energy and the inner knowledge of our “soul” or greater identity, and we are supposed to learn how to use our awesome power with skill and wisdom.